With history generally written in a self-serving, sanitized fashion, it's refreshing to see a different take on US involvement in the Philippines -- one more in keeping with the general Philippine view of the situation as well, I estimate.
Betty Brooks created some wonderful characters here, but didn't fully develop all of them... some had such tiny parts in the story, I wondered why they were created in the first place.
When Anne travelled a century into the past, she was somehow able to adapt easily to the new surroundings... stretching into her memories of camping with her grandmother. However, camping in modern times is never that similar to travelling into the 1800s.
Ms. Brooks would have created a better story, had she shown the readers the differences in the modern and past communication styles. Anne used modern language, that was easily understood by the characters in the past... even though some of these words meant other things in that time. For example a kid, would be goats... not a child. When Anne called herself an offensive curse word, the characters from the past didn't wonder why she was calling herself a female dog... but instead responded with "you said it!"
The disappointing thing about this is that it was such a good story, that had such promise... if only a little more care and attention would have been given to the differences to the past/present time frame.
In addition to the other problems I listed about the book, the ending wasn't complete.... there were so many loose ends. When reading, I can see how talented Ms. Brooks is, however, a little more development of the story needs to take place... regardless of how long the story would become. This could have been a wonderful romantic story, about some very warm and caring characters.
Another good story from Ms. Neels. This time all the characters are English. This heroine does have a family, just not a great one (except the Aunt). There is also the dog and cat problem--you know-- no one else wants them, so off the heroine goes and gets into trouble. This hero is not as unapproachable as some of the others Ms. Neels uses, actually he's nice right from the start.
Apparently both these books sprang from a course being taught in the field and this shows. These books likely will be very useful to those who go out into Southern California. Their usefulness will be much more limited to anyone not actually in this area.
Among the species treated in "Deserts" there are very many subshrubs, as opposed to "Coastal Region Mountains" where properly woody species comprise the bulk of the book.
Perhaps it is a good book, but I thought that I was buying something different.
One thing surprised me a little, it is full of advertisements. Probably 1/3 to 1/2 of the book are advertisements from local establishments. Its like a pilot guide crossed with a magazine from Apple Vacations or a Cruise Line. It is sort of like the Oshkosh Program guide in that respect. It depends on your outlook as to wether you like all the advertisements or not (my wife liked the adds to see what was there, I didn't).