Used price: $6.99
Collectible price: $14.82
Buy one from zShops for: $6.50
List price: $14.95 (that's 30% off!)
Used price: $8.93
Buy one from zShops for: $8.94
Almost half the book is a plant directory, color-coded, divided into herbs, vegetables and fruit, with a few recipes for each.
This is pretty basic stuff, but the book is well focussed and nicely illustrated. It contains the information a novice gardener needs.
The back half of Atha's book lists container plants in his "Plant Directory." Not all plants are suited for growing in containers. Furthermore, some plants do well together and some do not. Atha divides his directory into herbs, vegetables, and fruits. Each entry includes information about plant tenderness, size, flower description (food plants have flowers), light requirements, propagation needs, and other information. He color codes the sections: purple for herbs; green for vegetables, and terra cotta for fruit. At the end of each section, he includes recipes for the various items. For example, under herbs you will find a recipe for a chamomile and bran face mask. Under vegetables you will find recipes for Borscht and Gazpacho. The fruit section includes recipes for spiced peaches and damson jam. This is a practical book for gardeners with intermediate skills.
Used price: $1.00
Collectible price: $15.95
Buy one from zShops for: $6.95
Used price: $5.26
Collectible price: $5.28
Buy one from zShops for: $7.95
Used price: $0.95
Used price: $22.26
In The Man Who Died Twice, a 1970's Los Angeles Police detective travels back to 1922 Los Angeles, and inhabits the body of William Desmond Taylor, a Hollywood producer who was murdered in real-life Hollywood in February 1922. The LA detective, Ernie Carter, has the advantage of knowing lots of details about the case, from having read the police files, and just living in the Hollywood/LA area all his life. Carter, with Taylor's personality serving as a kind of alter ego, tries to prevent Taylor (and himself!) from being murdered.
Along the way, Taylor/Carter encounters many legendary Hollywood figures, including D.W. Griffith, William Randolph Hearst, John Barrymore, Mabel Normand, and Rudolf Valentino. It is sobering to read about the sad and/or untimely end of many of these stars, and to contemplate how little Hollywood has changed since, to wit Judy Garland, Marilyn Monroe, John Belushi, Tony Perkins, and many many others.
Peeples brings Hollywood in 1922 to vibrant life, transporting the reader to the silent era with great skill. He seemingly mentions all of the possible murderers, and keeps the reader guessing as to which one he will use as the actual shooter. In real life, the case was never solved, but Peeples' murderer is convincing.
An old science fiction story once had a time traveller in the age of dinosaurs walking along a special path, from which he could not stray. He could not pick flowers, kill any of the animals, or leave any evidence of his visit. If he did, all of the ensuing history of the world would change, subtly in the time of dinosaurs, massively in his own 20th century. I am reminded of that story when I read a book like this. I will leave it to you, if you read this book, to discover if Peeples adheres to the tenets of the SF story.
Used price: $26.95
Collectible price: $47.65
Buy one from zShops for: $37.99
This may be the first book to make the HMS Agamemnon its subject. The problem with this book is that anyone who picks it up must be an admirer of Nelson, and must have already read at least a couple of biographies of him. For them the middle-section of the book is superfluous, being re-telling with some twist of the same story by other authors. Neither is it a one-volume biography of Nelson for beginners, as it is nominally about the career of the ship, although the author dwells on Emma Hamilton and even her and Nelson's daughter which is a sidetrack. 40% of the book is about Nelson's battles and his times, although he commanded the ship only about three and a half years. In the Battle of the Nile she did not take part, and at Copenhagen she was a spectator, being run aground early. If your interest is mainly on those wooden battleships, you had better buy "HMS Victory: Her Construction, Career and Restoration" by Alan McGowan. However special the Agamemnon was for Nelson, I hardly think a book specially on her was necessary.
Regarding Nelson the author is heavily indebted to previously published books, particularly those by Carola Oman ("Nelson" 1947) and Ernle Bradford ("Nelson: The Essential Hero" 1977). I happen to have Bradford's book, which Deane (sorry, I omit Mr, Mrs, Lord, Lady, etc. here) sometimes quotes verbatim, changing terms here and there, shuffling sentences, or adding or omitting something. A specimen is given below. It can be assumed that the author must be equally indebted to Oman and others. Well, such may be a common practice among writers which cannot bother ignorant readers. At least Deane has the honesty to name his sources -- well, most of the time. A notable omission seems to be Nelson's Letters and Dispatches. Certainly there are things he himself researched from original sources rather than published books, namely, on the Agamemnon's career before and after Nelson, particularly her shipwreck. However, I would like to discuss two points which would be of interest to people who might be considering to buy the book. By examining a couple of fruits you could judge the quality of the whole tree, I think.
1. Lack of official credit to Nelson for the successful siege and capture of Bastia.
Deane p.108 -- "It was also Serocold ("who commanded the Proselyte, a bomb-brig") who had stood up for Nelson when Hood (then Nelson's superior), FOR REASONS BEST KNOWN TO HIMSELF, had in dispatches given most of the credit for the command of the batteries at Bastia to Captain Anthony Hunt and had merely mentioned Nelson as 'commanding and directing the seamen, landing guns, mortars and stores.' Serocold had been so incensed at this injustice that he had said that Hunt 'never was on a battery, or even rendered any service during the siege... if any person says he did, then I submit to the character of a story-teller', and he had hotly announced his intention of 'publishing an advertisement' with the truth."
Here, remarkably, Deane gives no sources. He writes above "for reasons best known to himself" but others knew them well, too, albeit unofficially.
Bradford, whom Deane quotes so frequently, explaines: "the fact was Hunt, who had lost his ship through no fault of his own, was in need of the assistance that a favourable report from Hood could give him. Hood himself knew well enough the true circumstances of the case, ..." Bradford, too, ascribes the statement, "that Hunt never was on a battery, etc." to Serocold but it was none other than Nelson himself who wrote it. I wonder who made the mistake first. To quote more fully from his letter to his uncle Maurice Suckling: "Lord Hood and myself were never better friends -- nor although his Letter does, did he wish to put me where I never was -- in the rear. Captain Hunt who lost his Ship, he wanted to push forward for another -- a young man who never was on a battery, or ever rendered any service during the siege; if any person ever says he did, then I submit to the character of a story-teller. The whole operation of the Siege were carried on through Lord Hood's letters to me. I was the mover of it -- I was the cause of its success. Sir Gilbert Elliot will be my evidence, if any is required. I am not a little vexed, but shall not quarrel...." -- Nelson's Letters, ed. by Geoffrey Rawson 1960.
2. Nelson's joining the fleet before Trafalgar.
Deane, p.180 -- "At dawn on 28 September with the scent of Spanish orange groves wafting from the shore, the Victory joined the fleet off Cádiz." Maybe a nice touch giving a local colour, which Deane does occasionally. I only wish it was based on recoded facts.
Bradford, p.330 -- "On 28 September, the Victory sauntering along -- 'we have very little wind' -- Nelson sighted the fleet of which he was to take command." This sounds far more authentic.
Nelson, in the letter dated October 1, 1805 to Emma Hamilton -- "I joined the Fleet late on the evening of the 28th of September, but could not communicate with them until the next morning."
Specimen.
Deane, p.102 -- The British miliary hierarchy at San Fiorenza had sarcastically nicknamed Nelson "The Brigadier" because he had voiced his opinion that the taking of Bastia was feasible, while their own generals, first Dundas and later D'Aubant who had succeeded him, refused to attempt it without reinforcement from Gibraltar. Who was this thirty-five year old naval upstart, they asked, who dared dispute military strategy with professionals such a themselves? Nelson was about to prove to them that he deserved the military title they had given him in sarcasm and that he could mete out punishment to the enemy on land in the same measure that he could at sea.
Bradford, p.104 -- The military at San Fiorenza, who had been openly contemptuous of Nelson's optimisic view about the feasibility of taking Batia without waiting for reinforcements, had sarcastically nicknamed him "The Brigadier". Who was this thirty-five-year-old naval captain, they argued, to be disputing with professionals like themselves, let alone their general? Nelson was soon to prove that he was as deserving of his military title as his naval one.
His history is very inclusive and well documented (easy and accessible footnotes). I was most impressed with his history of HMS Agamemnon (my name sake, in case you haven't smoked it yet) as a paradigm for the naval wars of the Revolutionary and Napoleonic period. His bio of Nelson is also well done and congruous with the rest of the book.
All in all a very solid buy that will fit nicely on your naval history shelf. If you don't have one... either start one, or get another book, sorry to say.
Used price: $20.33
Buy one from zShops for: $20.28
The articles are divided evenly between: (a) previously published and still accessible material; and, (b) new, politically contextualized pieces. The latter work very well.
The general quality of the editing is good, though continuity suffers in the assessment of Saro-Wiwa because of the mix between poetry and appraisal. Occasionally the writing of individual entries is abominably dull because of an elementary sense of stylistics and the most rudimentary grasp of rhetoric. That said, the book is a serious tribute to Saro-Wiwa, well meant.
In addition, the publication provides a lucid overview of the literary output of Saro-Wiwa over the years and presents them in clear perspective against the inimical background in which the writer labored tirelessly.
This is a book recommended to all people who desire justice in a world increasingly threatened by the evil spectre of "might over right".
Used price: $0.40
Collectible price: $0.39
Nice anecdotes and insights into the minds and egos of some of the great names of yesteryear.