Olivia met and married a man whose dream of service she has shared for over 50 years. Two mission assignments took the Casbergs to India. The Free Methodist Church sent them to a mission station. Then the Presbyterian Church,USA sent them to Ludhiana as Director of a large medical center. This book considers the wife's place in her companion's assignments overseas and in the USA.

After reading this book, I realize how things have changed! It would be impossible today to repeat the Missouri kid's journey to California.

The way he wove his story is so Missouri (good old slow-talking but ever-so-charming)

Thanks to James Scott for telling his story of growing up in America!

Do you love mules? Do you own one or are you just curious about these intelligent, wonderful beings? Then you should check out this two volume set. It is full of valuable information and some of the most wonderful pictures I've ever seen.

Well written and very informative. A must for any long ears lover's library. Melvin Bradley has created an educational piece of work.

In his ambitiously titled book, "The Nature of the Common Law," Professor Melvin Eisenberg's stated goal "is to develop the institutional principles that govern the way in which the common law is established in our society." In doing so, Eisenberg addresses the functions of courts in American society, modes of legal reasoning and the process of overturning prior precedents. Yet Eisenberg never loses sight of his central thesis, namely that "all common law cases are decided under a unified methodology, and under this methodology social propositions always figure in determining the rules the courts establish and the way in which those rules are extended, restricted, and applied." To say that courts should and do rely on social propositions (such as moral norms and public policy) in deciding common law cases is hardly new. Eisenberg's contribution comes in mapping a coherent course between the Scylla and Charybdis of modern jurisprudence. He explicitly rejects theories claiming that some cases can be decided without reference to social propositions. On the other hand, Eisenberg also rejects theories claiming that legal reasoning is nothing more than a mask for the social and political values of the decisionmaker. Any complex society needs an institution before which claims based on existing societal standards can be heard. In our society, that institution is the courts. "If the courts resolved disputes by reasoning from those moral norms and policies they think best, there would be no institution to which a member of the society could go to vindicate a claim of right based on existing standards." Second, since the judicial system is a peculiarly undemocratic institution, the legitimacy of the adjudicative process requires courts to look to "existing legal and social standards rather than those standards the court thinks best." Finally, prohibiting the courts from employing their personal standards makes legal reasoning fairer and more easily replicable by the profession.

Common law adjudication thus is not merely the ad hoc application of whatever social propositions a particular judge is taken by; rather, he lays out institutional principles that constrain and guide the adjudicative use of social propositions. According to Eisenberg, adjudicators may only employ those norms or policies that "can fairly be said to have substantial support in the community, can be derived from norms [or policies] that have such support, or appear as if they would have such support." Two critical assumptions underlie this claim: (1) that social morality is a meaningful concept; and (2) that judges are capable of discerning and effectively applying social morality. As space does not permit one to do full justice to Eisenberg's defense of those assumptions, suffice it to say that the argument is well-crafted and even-handed.

Eisenberg's second claim is that courts have a duty to utilize only those social propositions that have the requisite degree of social support. "By accepting and retaining office the judge undertakes an ongoing commitment to carry out the rules of the office," one of which is "a moral obligation to faithfully employ the norms of social morality ... whether or not he privately agrees with those norms." One may be skeptical about the force of an oath of office in constraining judicial discretion, but this is not the only arrow in Eisenberg's quiver. A variety of corrective forces come into play when a judge strays from those social propositions having the requisite degree of support. From the aggrieved litigant's perspective, the best outcome will be a reversal on appeal. Even if the decision stands, however, it may nevertheless soon be consigned to the dust bin of legal history. Lawyers will make a decent living arguing that the rule should be overturned or distinguished in future cases. Commentators and other courts may point out the decision's flawed reasoning. In extreme cases, the legislature may step in. In sum, common law decisions do not live in a vacuum. The wider arena of legal discourse acts a significant check on judicial error, whether the "error" is deliberate or accidental.

At first glance, Eisenberg's thesis appears to create substantial problems of doctrinal stability. He is unwilling, however, to make doctrinal propositions entirely defeasible in the face of changing social propositions. Accordingly, he constrains the use of social propositions by giving some counter-balancing weight to the value of doctrinal stability. In areas where parties are unlikely to plan their behavior based on existing doctrines, doctrinal stability may be relatively unimportant and a court should be fairly liberal in bringing out of whack doctrines back into line. But in areas such as property and estates, where planning is common and reliance on doctrinal stability is likely, courts should be more reticent. In these latter areas, techniques such as signaling (in which the court suggests that it will revisit the issue later) or prospective overturning may be more appropriate than an immediate reversal of existing doctrine.

For readers persuaded by Eisenberg, or at least interested in seeing his ideas play out, the book's only major flaw is likely to be its length: It is too short. For example, I would have been interested in Eisenberg's view of the claim that efficiency is the sole acceptable and/or the prevailing norm in common law adjudication. Perhaps the most glaring omission, however, is Eisenberg's failure to discuss in more detail the relationship of statutory interpretation to common law adjudication. Nonetheless, it belongs in every common lawyer's library.

There may be other texts out there of this calibre, but this has to be one of the best there is. Used as THE reporting/writing bible for graduate journalism students in schools like Columbia University. If you want to be a reporter, a journalist, this would be an excellent resource to have, to study, to refer back to. (Your copy is likely to become worn and dog-eared over the years.)

This series of books are great for people who don't have the time or the resources to hunt down unfamilar protocols. This volume is fairly complete for current (and older) NO and NOS based techniques.

Reine Melvin's stories are quiet studies into lives and relations of subtle irony. But there is always a seething undercurrent in all that gentle introspection, until very carefully, the curtains - cerebral and emotional - are drawn up to reveal a valuable epiphany. Comment by Alfred A. Yuson

This is a wonderful cookbook featuring delicious & nutritious recipes. Most recipes are easy-to-make & use common ingredients. All are low in fat with no recipe containing more than 4 grams per serving.

The author starts out by explaining the miracle of yogurt cheese & how to make it. She also discusses other ingredients & how to make the recipes even healthier. Nutrition information is provided along with dietetic exchanges.

Recipes include dips, spreads, appetizers, salads, dressings, snacks, chilled soups, & breads. Many varieties of cheesecake, cookies, cakes, pies, puddings, frostings, & fondues are also included.

There are even recipes for many flavors of frozen yogurt that only require a blender. Some of my favorites are the crescents, soft pretzels, & no-cook cucumber soup. I also enjoyed the scrumptious oatmeal kiss cookies.

Published just in time for Passover, the holiday of freedom, Melvin Jules Bukiet (STRANGE FIRE, NEUROTICA, SIGNS AND WONDERS, Professor at Sarah Lawrence) has collected some of the works of the children of Shoah survivors, the Second Gen'ers, the "2G." I was drawn to this book by its cover art, in which the sign over the gates to Auschwitz reads "NOTHING MAKES YOU FREE" instead of the actual "WORK MAKES YOU FREE/Arbeit Macht Frei". Included in the book are pieces in English and those translated into English from Italian, French, Serbian, Swedish, Hebrew, German, and Hungarian. Although these adult "CHILDREN" grew up around the world, they carry a common literary burden and can spot each other in crowded rooms. Bukiet (the son of number 108016) asks "how atrocity gets filtered through imagination." This collection helps to answer it. He writes that if the Holocaust is a historic Rorschach blot, in it the depressive can justify despair, the hopeful can find redemption, and the stupid can discern the triumph of the spirit. The collected authors grew up as children of a nightmare, children of the khurban that "is a black hole that devours the light." Bukiet explains that they lived with parents that had numbers tattooed on their arms; parents who saw their kids as replacements for murdered family members; parents whose Yiddish language was now as dead as Sanskrit; parents who appreciated life having known death (or resigned themselves to suicide); parents with cauterized tear ducts; and parents who never wasted food at the dinner table, having known hunger intimately. Their parents lived with the aftermath of atrocity and passed on these psyches to their 2G-Second Generation children (either through speaking of it always or never speaking of it). Many of the 2G authors are rage filled, angry, cynical, and distrustful. And This makes for good writing.

The authors included in the collection are, in Part 1: Carl Friedman, Eva Hoffman, Victoria Reel, Tammie Bob, Ruth Knafo Setton, Goran Rosenberg, Doron Rabinovici, Alan Kaufman, and Barbara Finkelstein; in Part 2: Savyon Liebrecht, JJ Steinfeld, Thane Rosenbaum, Henri Raczymov, Sonia Pilcer, Lily Brett, Val Vinokurov, Helena Janaczek, Esther Dischereit, and cartoonist Art Spiegelman; and in Part 3: Anne Karpf, Lea Anini, Gila Lustiger, Joseph Skibell, Leon De Winter, Alcina Lubitch Domecq, Mihaly Kornis, Peter Singer, David Albahari, Alain Finkielkraut, and the editor Melvin Jules Bukiet. I recommend that you read the authors' brief bios before starting to read the collected works. Not included are authors like David Lehman and David Curzon, who identify as 2G, but whose parents escaped Vienna in 1939; and the journalist, Joseph Berger (Displaced Persons), since he were born slightly prior to May 7, 1945.

this book covered all technology and application about Polyamide(in general called Nyoln which was duPont's tradename).
I strongly recommended that those who are working at engineering plastics buisness and are interested in polymer science.
Really Geat books and bible on Polyamide technology.