Used price: $15.07
Buy one from zShops for: $15.19
Used price: $13.99
Motor racing as a whole has not cared much about statistics with the exception of who won a particular event and to a lesser degree how much money they earned.
The notable exception to this is the Indianapolis "500", where participants are kept under a microscope from the first day of rookie orientation until the last person leaves the annual victory banquet. Drivers and teams who do not qualify for the annual race are given more media attention than winners of many major motor sports events!
This book examines the stories surrounding the Indy "500" from 1911 to 1997 (year before publication). In addition to listing every starting field (qualification type, starting position, number of laps run, reason for retirement, etc.), photos of every participant (the so called "wedding photo" taken after qualifications) are included. At least 4 pages are devoted to each race with the expected highlights, but also many of the stories of struggle and heartbreak that teams go through each year are detailed.
Much of the history of the famed "Brickyard" is also covered, with photos showing the evolution of the physical facility over time.
If you are a motor racing fan. and particularly if you are an avid follower of the Indy "500", you should have this well done reference work in your library.
Used price: $1.88
Collectible price: $5.25
Buy one from zShops for: $7.50
List price: $11.95 (that's 20% off!)
Used price: $8.31
Buy one from zShops for: $7.95
List price: $24.95 (that's 30% off!)
Used price: $13.87
Collectible price: $19.01
Buy one from zShops for: $13.87
In other words they did not want us to become exact mental, emotional and social clones or mere automatons of a Federal Government "1984" mentality run amuck. People like Earl Warren and Warren Burger succeeded in putting us on that destructive hedonistic and anti-American coarse by hijacking the judiciary.
Local control as Patrick Henry and Thomas Paine advocated, would undeniably put the decision making process in the hands of the voters and real-democracy at the lowest levels, they did not believe in Stare Decisis which kills a true ever-changing democracy. They wanted the "one person one vote" majority-rule concept to flourish on a local level, instead of having a federal government, which steals that basic right, concept and liberty at every opportunity by manipulating entities at every level and corrupting the courts.
Certainly government at the federal level was and still is necessary for some very basic issues, like those identified in the Preamble to the Constitution for instance, but never at the level it is at today.
It all comes back to that corrupting influence of power. I found it strange that he did not speak of term-limits as a counterbalancing protection for his Juris Naturalis ideology, the only real protection to saved us from the decline in founding principles as society grew, matured, evolved and became corrupted. A corruption that transformed the philosophy of the people, by the people, and for the people; to one of me, we, our party and an "our cause only mentality."
As much as I enjoyed his wit, humor, intelligent discourse and insight, which will undoubtedly cause me to read the rest of his books, which I highly recommend as a Middle School introduction to all his subjects, I could not possibly agree with all his teachings, opinions and/or assertions. Perhaps it is just that in his attempt to cover so many bases he seemed to have numerous contradictory comments that makes one stop and say wait a minute that is just not true.
For instance he asked, "has anyone ever suggested to you that government may not be necessary?" That is a foolish question today, of coarse it is.
He also asserts for instance that the right wants to stamp out sin and the left wants to stamp out inequality of wealth. These are interesting assertions but facades and falsehoods and assumptions that have no real basis. Those comments could be just as easily phrased like this, "the right wants to make people merit conscious and responsible for their actions by teaching morality and the left wants to rob from those who work to give to those who don't. Both of these statements would be equally as true, but give a completely different impression to the reader.
How can the left be said to believe in stamping out the inequality of wealth when so many of them, and I do mean, many of them, are filthy rich and getting richer every day at the expense of the poor and middle class in America. They are in fact the arrogant Aristocracy of the western civilization so hated by the Middle East. It is not our government or our true American values and culture that the Middle Easterners hate so much, but the liberal rich people and their hedonistic tendencies, policies and activities that irk them so much. When someone asks why Islam hates America it is simply because of liberal ideologies, policies and programs. It is as simple as that.
When I see Ted Turner, Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, Barbara Streisand, Dianne Feinstein, Ted Kennedy, Steven Speilberg, Hugh Hefner and several thousand other left-wing liberal icons give away their millions and/or billions and live on what I make, I will change my opinion of the left. But for today I disagree with Mr. Maybury's assertion about the goal of liberals, wanting to fix any inequalities, they create them.
They want power and the ability to oppress others at any cost and sit in their Eiffel towers dictating socialistic and hedonistic principle and rules of conduct on the rest of us peons. In others words I believe his definition of "Fascist" more aptly fits the modern day liberal than the word "liberal" does, and I would put fascist at the far left end of his scale rather than the right end, but hey it is his book.
There are many other inconsistencies of thought and assertion in his writings, but nothing significant enough to recommend skipping this truly enjoyable book. I have ordered and will most certainly read all the others as well, but with a critical eye. I truly enjoyed his work, with only minimal reservations, because I do read everything with the critical eye he instructs his readers to use.
As a series of books for beginners in politics, social issues and economic studies I can stand by the four star rating and highly recommend his thought provoking comments to those from all political persuasions. After reading this book I would have to classify myself as a Nationalistic Juris Naturalis of the Original "Classical Liberal" Judeo-Christian Founding Fathers Persuasion. Wow, what a mouthfull. Where are you in the mix?
982 Words
p.s i also recommend evaluating books: what would thomas jefferson think about this,and whatever happened to penny candy?
List price: $16.05 (that's 30% off!)
Used price: $12.75
Buy one from zShops for: $12.50
After finishing it, I picked up the "Thousand Year War" a little apprehensively to see if Maybury had lost his flare after the success of his previous books, as so many do, sort of like movie sequals that never meet or match the standards of the original, and luckily found that it was back on track with interesting, coherent information taht once again had me wanting to finish it in one setting.
Mr. Maybury needs to work The "Clipper Ship" over and could easily reduce it by half.
Of course I enjoy his work and will order the two follow on books WWI and WWII to round out my collection. All in all, he has made me a little bit wiser with this series and I still recommend it (all of them) to anyone who wants to understand the competing "models" that exist in the world and what makes the world go round.
Jim
Uncle eric shares many examples of cones through history especially the history of the clipper ship. Also included with each history overview is the summary of what those who found the cones did to profit from them. This i find to be an extreemely useful item within the book. Uncle eric does not only tell you what to do, he shows you actual instences in history when the cones were taken advantadge of.
Along with uncle erics guide to finding cones he also has a description of what types of cones there are, and which ones to get into and which ones to stay out of.
I find all of uncle erics advice to be extreemely useful in this book.
sincerely Piffer H
Used price: $6.45
Buy one from zShops for: $8.61
This is book one of a series and The Next Generation plays the minor role in this first installment. I believe this will change dramatically in book two due to a discovery that the Enterprise makes on an old Cardassian Freighter that requires a trip to the space station DS9. The one character that I always wondered what happened to plays a key role in this book and I would guess in many others that have preceded this volume. Ro Laren was always one of my favorite enigmatic characters from TNG series, and after she betrayed Captain Picard's trust and fled I was always curious as to what happened to her. Her back story is explained in broad strokes, but at the time of this book she is now in a position of authority on DS9. Nothing about her personality has become any smoother, but it appears as though there may finally be an opportunity for her to find someplace where she will no longer feel suspect, feel the outsider.
Prior to taking on any more new DS9 material I will have to go well back and reach a point where I can appreciate these stories without only having a brief historical overview for a crutch. This book seemed well done and I believe that to the extent it failed it was solely due to my lack of knowledge.
It was slow to start but has an excellent recap of Star Trek history
Second, allow me to make yet another point or two regarding how wonderful is the DS9 re-launch: This book clearly shows that more was going on in the universe during the Dominion War than just the war. While Starfleet might have you believe *everyone* was directly involved in the war effort, if you think about it, that could hardly be the case. I also enjoyed the continued idea that everyone doesn't use Federation lingo. You could never quite tell that from the show, but it certainly makes a whole lot of sense.
I'm also enjoying the running Morn joke, and I laughed right out loud at the reference to Vash. Too rich! Okay, onto the review:
Anyone who thought Jake Sisko should have been given better treatment as the series came to an end can take heart with the re-launch and with this book in particular. And I mean take heart. S.D. Perry has captured the true soul of this deep-thinking, honest young man. Ben Sisko raised his son well, and evidence of that can be read on every page.
Back in one of the first of the re-launch books, Jake left DS9, ostensibly to visit his grandfather on Earth, when in reality he was going to check out a prophecy revealed to him at B'hala. The story of what happened to him is told here, and, my, what a story it is - delightfully complex and containing ingredients guaranteed to keep you turning pages well after you should be asleep so you can make it to work on time the next day.
I would take up far too much space trying to explain every detail and nuance in this novel, so let's just say...in it, Jake Sisko comes full circle.
And so does Kai Opaka.
And we are all the better for it.