Used price: $4.00
Buy one from zShops for: $4.48
List price: $12.00 (that's 20% off!)
Used price: $1.25
Collectible price: $14.95
Buy one from zShops for: $7.00
Used price: $4.50
Now I am not writing this for unbelievers. They are too short-sided to appreciate the art of candle burning.
Used price: $24.29
Buy one from zShops for: $24.29
Used price: $11.80
Buy one from zShops for: $19.03
Specifically, this book contains plentiful precedent studies and deals with various issues relating to its subject. Hence I could learn much from this book. And the conclusion it reached as to the basis of the binding force of customary international law is held to be persuasive enough to make scholars in both disciplines understood clearly.
If you are to study international law or international relations or both in the new century and in the global society, you cannot help getting and reading this writing.
List price: $12.99 (that's 20% off!)
Used price: $5.98
Buy one from zShops for: $5.98
Written at a level perfect for the later elementary school child, this book teaches science in a unique and interesting way. I strongly recommend it.
The short circuit method discussed (without the annoying use of the per unit system) is flexible and powerful. I refer to it time and again.
This is a must-have resource.
Buy one from zShops for: $29.00
Lopez continues a revaluation of Emerson's "demanding optimism" that had its first roots in Newton Arvin's compensatory essay "The House of Pain: Emerson and the Tragic Sense." (Hudson Review, Vol. XII, No. 1, Spring 1959) Lopez describes a "New Emerson," like the "New Nietzsche" that has emerged since Gilles Deleuze's Nietzsche and Philosophy (1962) Jacques Derrida's "Differance" (1968) "The Ends of Man" (1972) and Tracy Strong's Friederich Nietzsche and the Politics of Transfiguration (1975).
Lopez's book is an excellent corrective to the conventional wisdom and what has nearly become the standard interpretation of Emerson, although Lopez argues forcefully that no reading of Emerson has established itself as the accepted standard view. Emerson is distinguished from other major American writers of his time such as Poe, Whitman and Melvill precisely on the lack of a consensus as to what his main writings mean. This is in part because scholars have been reluctant to take what Emerson says in his major published works at face value. The typical response to his 'hard sayings' is to attribute the hyperbolic style and his exuberance and enthusiasm. But Lopez shows more than that Emerson expresses ideas in line with the intellectual and philosophical milieux of the ninetieth century. He also shows that Emerson's ironies, aphorisms, peculiar voicing of claims and subtle forms of self-erasure warrant a view of his work as significantly more 'modern' or even 'post-modern' than has been allowed