Used price: $4.00
Buy one from zShops for: $4.00
Used price: $3.35
Buy one from zShops for: $4.75
And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church.
What? Came the word of God from you? Or came it unto you only?
Holy Bible, 1 Co.14:34-36 (KJV)
Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection.
But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over a man, but to be in silence.
1 Tim. 2:11-12
Adam Clark, one of the most respected theologians and author of a standard Bible commentary wrote on the subject of these verses about women keeping silent in Church...
"They are the only verses in the whole Book of God, which even by a false translation can be made prohibitory of women speaking in the Church. How come then, that by these passages, which according to the best Greek authorities, are wrongly rendered, and wrongly applied. How comes it then, that women's lips have been sealed for centuries. How is it, that these texts have been allowed to stand unexamined, and unexplained for centuries?"
In his book 'The Woman Question', Reverand Hagin has fulfilled Clark's request magnificently. He analyzes the Scriptures which have kept women bound for centuries, and rightly-divides by the Holy Spirit, illuminating God's wonderful redemptive plan for women, the same as men.
Brother Hagin makes the point that Full Gospel (Pentecostal) believers make the loudest claim to adhering most closely to the Word of God of all Christians, yet they do not 'silence women' and they readily 'allow women to teach men'.
Therefore, either Full Gospeldom had erred, or traditionalists have missed something very important.
Women have been kept in bondage for centuries, and whole denominations founded upon a profound misunderstanding of the verses which clearly state that women should remain silent in Church.
Hagin points out that in the original Greek there is only one word for man, none for husband, only one Greek word for woman, and none for wife. Herein lies the key.
Therefore, the reader must decide from the context if the Holy Spirit means women in general, or wives.
For example verse 34 cannot be describing ALL women, because all women don't have husbands.
Clearly unmarried women are not included in this injunction.
So in this verse the Greek word 'gyne' should be translated as 'wives'.
Similarly, with the other verse;
Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection.
But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over a man, but to be in silence.
1 Tim. 2:11,12
Here Paul is not talking about ALL women but about wives, and about wives learning something, and asking questions.
When the Greek word 'gyne' is translated as wife instead of woman, then these 'troublesome' verses make sense, and harmonize perfectly with the rest of Scripture.
See how it reads when 'gyne' is interpreted as wife, and husband rather than 'man' is used. (Both perfectly legitimate translations).
Let the wife learn in silence with all subjection.
But I suffer not a wife to teach, nor to usurp authority over a husband, but to be in silence.
1 Tim. 2:11,12
The Author points out the need for such an injuncution regarding wives.
There is no need to prevent women in general from dictating to men in general, that was not the problem, nor will it ever be.
But some wives certainly have tried to dictate to their husbands. Paul and the Holy Spirit are simply saying that they shouldn't.
Furthermore, in Paul's day, women were poorly educated, and if they didn't understand something, they should not disturb the meeting, but rather ask their husbands when they get home.
Having preached in Hill Tribe cultures where both men and women are still poorly educated, I can personally vouch for this interpretation. Our meetings contained lots of women, often sitting at the back suckling babies. When one didn't understand something, she would start a conversation, "What does he mean?"
Another woman would try to explain to her, "Well, it's like this..."
Somebody else would join in loudly, "No, he's saying..."
Soon I'd lose their attention, and they would become a noisy distraction, to the rest of the people.
Thank God, He's left us a clear instruction for such situations, to tell them to be quiet, and ask their husbands to explain when they get home.
Hagin emphasizes the importance of the Law of Scriptural Interpretation. That every Scripture must be interpreted in the light of every other Scripture on the same subject, and it MUST harmonize with all other Scripture.
Was Paul, writing under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, illogical enough to 'tell women to be quiet' in the 14th Chapter of First Conthians, whilst telling them that they could pray (out loud) and prophesy (out loud) in the 11th Chapter of the same epistle? Of course not!
But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered dishonoureth her head; for that is even all as if she were shaven.
1 Co. 11:5
Paul would not prevent women speaking messages from God, he would allow His daughters to prophesy. (As foretold in Joel's prophecy, fulfilled in Acts 2.) Neither should anybody else stop women prophesying under the anointing of the Holy Spirit.
Brother Hagin states that he is convinced that Paul was saying; "I suffer not a wife to teach or usurp authority over a husband."
With the proviso, that if the husband were not yet a Christian, she might well have to teach him. Even take authority in the home if the husband is not assuming his role in godly leadership.
The Woman Question covers other topics in equally illuminating style with chapters entitled;
Is the Man the Head of the Woman?
Must Wives Always Obey their Husbands?
Must Women have their Heads Covered in Church?
Proper Dress and Adornment for Christian Women
And concludes that with God, there is neither male nor female, just people. The distinction God makes is founded not on sex but on marital status.
In Church matters, in regard to spiritual concerns in the Body of Christ, there are no distinnctions between men and women. As far as God is concerned, there are none.
Many Christians go wrong by missing the point of these verses. They relate not to a man-woman situation, but to a husband-wife one.
The man is not the head of the woman in the Church. The husband is the head of his wife in the home.
There is therefore neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female; for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
Gal.3:26-28
In concluding this review I challenge you if you claim to be a Christian, if you hunger after truth, not tradition, if you are willing to repent when Jesus shows you your error, to read this powerful Scriptural analysis of the 'Woman verses'.
I, as a man, a Spirit-filled follower of Christ, and a full-time missionary, have no hesitation in unreservedly endorsing every word of Reverand Hagin's anointed book 'The Woman Question'.
Every Christian man and woman should read it, and seek the Lord for fresh revelation of this vital issue.
To those willing to repent and follow Christ. It's message will fit like an old-glove on a bruised hand, and be a life-transforming blessing in your walk with the Saviour.
Buy it, and put copies in your Church library, and in your public library. Give it to your pastor and the women in your life, and the Lord will confirm His Word.
List price: $10.95 (that's 20% off!)
Used price: $4.98
Collectible price: $7.95
Buy one from zShops for: $7.42
A must for those interested in a general overview of Japanese poetry, this little jewel shines with the light of the Classic poets (from Princess Nukada, 7th Century, to Abutsu-ni, A.D.1209-1283). A sample:
"I fell asleep thinking of him,
"And he came to me.
"If I had known it was only a dream
"I would have never awakened...". (Ono No Komachi, 9th Century)
Then we get a good sample of the Tokugawa Haiku poets, from the 16th to the 18th Centuries, as well as Modern Tanka and Haiku poets.
The book also provides a view of the modern free verse poets of Japan and, finally, some anonymous Geisha songs, such as:
"From the dream where we made love
my laughter called me back
and I searched all around me
my eyes full of tears......."
Finally the book ends with helpful biographical notes about the poets and a basic survey of Japanese poetry and the influence of the women poets.
Very highly recommended to those that want an introduction to the wonderful Japanese poems, which are timeless..........
The name of each poet has been drawn by master calligrapher, Machi Shunso and adds immeasurably to the reading experience.
How these poems resonate through the ages!
From Enomoto Seifu-Jo (1731-1814):
Everyone is asleep
There is nothing to come between
the moon and me.
List price: $100.00 (that's 30% off!)
Used price: $31.99
Buy one from zShops for: $57.00
Used price: $7.24
found it fun. I didn't have to "get after them"
to finish the lesson. Just the kind of book for me!!
Used price: $37.00
Buy one from zShops for: $55.30
List price: $15.00 (that's 30% off!)
Used price: $7.45
Well worth reading and a good companion to any library shelf for continual reference.
Roi Tauer IDEATORS LIMITED (Hong Kong)
Used price: $25.00
Buy one from zShops for: $55.95
Kenneth Lux argues forcefully that Adam Smith's thesis 'The Wealth of Nations' is but a clarion call to Greed, despite Smith's original intentions to the contrary.
Long after this 'mandate for greed' was absorbed into the fabric of accepted social behaviour and instituted as the norm for legally sanctified economic intercourse, the nations of the world convulse rapaciously with the disproportionate spread in wealth. And the ecosystems of the planet, its air, its earth and its water tether on the brink of collapse.
With the keen insight of the psychologist Kenneth Lux offers a glimmer of redemption from the present dismal state of affairs... "temper 'self interest' with 'benevolence' and things can become very different" he counsels. He does not claim originality for this idea, a truism to be found in all the old books of wisdom. Something mankind has lost sight of and is in urgent need of rediscovery.
Sadly this book by Kenneth Lux "Adam Smith's Mistake: How A Moral Philosopher Invented Economics And Ended Morality", Shambhala 1990, is out of print and out of stock. A few second hand copies retail at three times the original cost!
It's also a pity such an earthshattering book as this is now out of print, for it diagnoses the rot at the core of Classical Neoliberal economics so eloquently and plainly. It is a strongly ethical critique that lays bare a critical mistake in the reasoning of Adam Smith...a mistake that has been siezed on by all subsequent Neo-liberal "classical" economists and is the only thing they care to remember about Adam Smith...It was joked once on NPR that Adam Smith couldn't get a job in todays' business press because he'd be percieved as "too lefty". This is actually quite true...if, as Noam Chomsky has pointed out, anyone would actually bother to mull thru the whole of Smith's works. But no, what gets lached on to is the selfishness doctrine (Smith's Mistake) as the key economic engine, and all of Smith's moral reservations and other conscientious handwringing are forgotten/rendered mute by this mistake...and it is upon this mistake that the whole unjust real-existing capitalist world order has been built and continues to rest.
"So?" you might say, "Marx already did this in Das Kapital". Well, yes, but not quite. Lux knows about Marx, of course, and has a few humanistic/ethical choice barbs to toss his way also.
Although Lux does not use this language to describe his position, his solution to the dilema does basically come from the anarcho-syndicalist circles of Spain (both during and even, covertly, AFTER the Spanish Civil War), plus a little Gandhi & MLK thrown in for good measure. That summary is a bit too pat, and it's hard to summarize briefly and still do the book justice; JUST READ IT. You will never look at economics quite the same ever again.
All in all a fine book that has pride of place on my bookshelf. Worth conducting an "out of print" booksearch for, by all means.