The first half of this is a pretty good read, as the author provides some decent context about the development of baseball around the turn of the last century.

The second half has a tendency to degenerate into repetitive and awfully superficial chronicle, and doesn't bring the 20's and 30's to life in the same way as the earlier sections--even though there were colorful characters galore available.

(I noticed the same flatness in large sections of Alexander's history of baseball, Our Game. There too he often retreats to mere narrative, and away from insight.)

If you've read the 50 or so better baseball books available, or if you enjoy hearing oft-told tales told once more, this is a pleasant enough way to kill two or three afternoons.

This is the first book I have read from the many that Charles Alexander has written about turn of the century baseball players and I have to say that Mr. Alexander is a voracious researcher as he has facts and events of McGraw's life down to every little detail. For this, he is to be commended as he has certainly put to paper, atleast to this point, the definitive book on John McGraw.
However, this is not a short or an entertaining read by any stretch of the imagination as Alexander's book is decidedly bland in its detailed accounts of seasons past. After detailing McGraw's many outbursts on and off the field, Alexander chronicles McGraw's gambling misdeeds and even possible corruption (to the degree of the 1919 Black Sox). But Alexander does not write with a lot of imagination. His work reads exactly like you might expect a chronological account might: vanilla.
Although I enjoyed reading this book and appreciated all of the facts and research Alexander did on McGraw, I cannot say that this is one of the better baseball books I have read. Still, it remains the only book of any substance on McGraw, so if you want to learn about one of the most important men in the history of baseball, this is your book.

John McGraw dominated the landscape of baseball from 1890 until 1933. He came to demolish the enemy in score and spirit- and often succeded. He was the Master of an age where sportsmanship was considered a negative. From his days as a star and ringleader of the dirty & scrappy (NL)Baltimore Orioles until his death soon after managing the first NL all-star team, McGraw played key roles in nearly every major event in baseball's most formative years.

In 1901 he helped formed the American League, then tried to kill the AL in 1902. Why no World Series in 1904? McGraw. Inventor of the Hit-and-run? McGraw. Originator of collarless uniforms? McGraw. First to use Relief specialist in the bullpen? McGraw. First in 3 World Series in a row? McGraw. 4 in a row? McGraw. Only his pupil Casey Stengel has matched McGraw for total pennants. His career placed him in a pennant race NEARLY EVERY YEAR in 5 DECADES! (As Manager 10-1st, 10-2nd, 4-3ed place finishes in 32 years.)

Alexander presents the events of McGraw's life in chronological order- enabling the reader to use 'John McGraw' as a reference book for what happened in baseball in any given year due to the detail provided by Alexander. Charles C. Alexander writes history books about baseball; not mere collections of tales and legends set to prose. His facts are throughly researched and documented. However, even well written history books sometimes become tedious in detail. This book is no exception. Personally, I prefer an overkill of facts to haphazard story telling. Not quite as well written as the masterful 'Ty Cobb' and compelling 'Rogers Hornsby' by Alexander, but still the cream of baseball biographies.

Most biographies are geared towards illustrating the life of a famous figure for the purpose of presenting or revisiting the accomplishments. This biography, however, does not give the central focus to the writings and finds of Charles Darwin; the thesis deals more with Darwin being a possible hypochondriac.

The preface and appendix discuss recent research regarding Darwin's being an invalid during parts of his life. Some research deals with a disease that he may have picked up in South America while on the voyage of the HMS Beagle; some research says that Darwin was merely obsessed with being sick and therefore created a self-fulfilling prophecy.

This brings us to the text. Although Darwin's life is shown to us, as well as some additional information on family and colleagues, the life is covered in regards to his worst periods of sickness. By plotting this out for us, Bowlby shows us that many of these periods are preceded by deaths of family members close to Darwin and by fierce scrutiny of his discoveries and writings.

Another idea is the family's way of dealing with intense emotion. Rather than express this emotion by crying or mourning, it was internalized. This internalization led to depression, which led to sickness.

This biography is written less as a narrative of Darwin's life, but more as a proof for the author's thoughts on Darwin's sickness. As a result, there are many points where the author becomes more noticeable.

This is still an intriguing book, and I would recommend reading it.

The life and times of Darwin are masterfully brought to our attention by child emotional development expert and pioneer John Bowlby. Darwin's biography and upbringing are masterfully revealed and how they relate to his lifelong behavior, health, choices, and decisions in life. A most interesting aspect of this book is how evolution unknowingly affected Darwin's behavior as he himself is formulating and writing his famous theories on evolution. Because of the voluminous and extremely revealing written personal and professional correspondence by Darwin and his acquaintances a very good record of his health can be deduced from it. A must for those interested in more details on Darwin's life and how evolution affected the emotions and behavior of the main founder of evolution himself; and written by child emotional development pioneer Bowlby. It is a very detailed and well written book. For a complete definitive traditional biography of Darwin you may want to go to a plethora of other books available on the subject.

My title probably says it all, but I will elaborate. I still think that janet Browne has made the best START to a biography, I just wish she would finish by giving us Vol. 2! In the meantime we have Bowlby and that isn't half bad. Full of interesting background material and written with a lively pace A NEW LIFE manages to steer through some of the perils of "psychohistory" that have damaged other authors and gives us an interesting and at times provocative look at Darwin and Darwin's time. Well worth the read.

The CD version of this book is very easy to use and the search function is wonderful. HOWEVER there is no way to copy text off the screen so you can paste it into other applications. I find this very frustrating and a big disappointment.

The CD version of "The Origin of Species" suffers from the same problem. Beware.

This was not the best choice for listening to in the car: too much tedious detail, and I found my mind wandering too often. Still, it was interesting, and I learned a lot.

Darwin was a promising but obscure student at Cambridge when he was suggested for the trip. By the time he returned, his reputation was made. It's not hard to see why: this book is packed with careful observations and attention to detail, as well as thoughtful analyses of topics from species extinction (though not origins at this stage) to the formation of coral atolls. Darwin is clearly very well-read and makes frequent references to the noted authorities of the time, sometimes supporting them and sometimes disagreeing.

I hadn't actually realized that the voyage of the Beagle was as long as it was. I saw it as a year or so, going from England to South America and back again. It was in fact a five-year, round-the-world cruise, covering the Pacific Islands, New Zealand, Australia, and numerous other locales as well as the well-known South America and the Galapagos.

My favorite parts are actually the more human anecdotes. Darwin is less than enchanted with New Zealand and Australia, and is not afraid of saying so, noting that most of the citizens are ex-convicts. My favorite single anecdote, though, is about the South American governor who is so dedicated to the rule of law that he has himself put in the stocks when he violates one of his own laws. Darwin also indicates his dislike of slavery and admits to feeling shame when he accidentally causes a male slave to flinch when he makes a threatening gesture to him. So much for that creationist conceit.

There are two appendices not written by Darwin. One is a summary of the orders given to Captain Fitzroy about the mission of the Beagle, which is very telling of the naval issues of the time. It focuses on getting accurate locations of known ports as well as the possible finding of new ones. As a Hornblower fan (and therefore with some interest in naval trivia), I found this very interesting.

The other appendix is Captain Fitzroy's attempt to construe their geological observations to be evidence of the Noachian Deluge. This is not on the same intellectual level as Darwin's writings, and I found it mostly of intellectual interest as evidence that creationist arguments have changed hardly at all in the last 175 years.

All in all, it's an interesting book and a classic of natural history, though not something I'd recommend listening to unless one has a passion for the subject.

Remember this says "Journal" and that is what it is. It is his first parson adventures on and off the Beagle. He even includes stories about the people on the ship, the ship's life, and maintenance. He is always going ashore and venturing beyond the ship charter to go where no Englishman has gone before. He makes friends with tyrants and the down trodden. Once, to get an animal to come to him, he lay on his back and waved his arms and legs in the air. Whatever you do, do not turn your back on him. He is always knocking something on the head and taking it back for study. It is fun trying to match the old names for places with the new.

not gonna do back flips for a math book

I am a college student and the math book that was at the bookstore was $100.00. I went onto amazon.com and found the same book in new condition (looked like)for $56.00. I was kind of weary about ordering on-line for the first time but was pleasently surprised. This was a great first experience and plan on ording all my books through amazon.com.

"Ideas" is the key here as we have calculators, computers, and what not to do any real number crunching or comparing. This book carries you from zero to the edges of most any mathematical discipline. The information in the margins ties the theories back to reality. At the appropriate locations in the margin are postage stamps from around the works are shown commemorating the individual mathematicians and scientists relating to the subject being studied. There is a section in the book with the answers to all the odd questions.

Finally a book anyone can understand not just those in the legal field. Being in the legal profession myself I find this book to be my bible. It's easy and takes you through the process step by step. The only thing you must watch out for are the forms which are constantly revised by the courts. Although this book gives you the names of the forms you will need, it is still your responsibility to check and make sure it's the most current one. One great way is to log onto the court's website where you can download the most recent forms for free. I find this book very helpful and hope you will too. Best of luck!

The earlier review is old. It was written in 1999. This book was updated in 2001. I found the book to be helpful, up-to-date and the most clear of all the CA divorce books.

I highly recommend it -- forms change all the time, it is always important to check copyright dates on any book when using the forms. Plus check on-line resources to make sure the forms are accurate.

The information and advice in this book is far superor than any of the other titles in the catagory.

The earlier review stating the forms were out of date is completely wrong and must be referring to an earlier edition of this book.

Plus, the review was posted in 1999. The new edition of this book came out in 2001.

This is an excellent book and if used right can save a lot of money.

Well written and interesting, but very outdated. You're better off with Keen's new _Medieval Warfare_ or Verbruggen or R.C. Smail (Crusading Warfare) or France's new book.

This is an excellent and fascinating work. I highly recomend it for anyone interested in warfare, the middle ages, or both. It is full of well-researched insights and synthesizes and provides a broad general framework for understanding warfare in this period. Serious scholars or those seeking to use this as a textbook should note that the original version that forms the basis of this book was written a century ago and is probably outdated, despite the rewritten portions. However, the greatest strength of this book is that it is extraordinarily well-written, and a pleasure to read.

Oman provides an excellent, well-researched look at the arms, tactics, and strategies of various medieval armies. He covers the rise of the era of heavy calvary, and describes how it was replaced by the English longbow and the Swiss pikeman. His discussion of the various battlefield tactics unique to each army, as illustrated through maps of many of the major battles, proves both informative and entertaining. This is by far the most "readable" and authoritative book on the subject I have read to date.

In the 1970s, when I was a student at a very Dispensationalist higher educational institution, I was told that Dispensationalism was, at that time, "in a state of stasis." On the one hand, stasis can denote stability, which can be a good thing. On the other hand, it can simply mean that nothing was happening to worsen an already unstable situation (as we see in some science fiction movies when an extremely sick patient is placed into stasis). Unfortunately for Dispensationalism, all evidence now points to the latter as being the true nature of the situation. ¶ Several years after I heard that remark, the chickens came home to roost on the house-of-cards that would later come to be known as "Revised Dispensationalism" -- revised to patch up some problems inherited from those who came to be known as "Classical Dispensationalists" -- and the inherent instability became apparent. Within a short time a "new, improved" brand of Dispensationalism hit the bookstore shelves: Progressive Dispensationalism. Time will tell whether the cards were replaced by something truly more substantial and enduring. ¶ One of the architects of Revised Dispensationalism, Charles C. Ryrie, was the consulting editor of the book under review here, "Issues in Dispensationalism." In the 1960s he wrote an irenic apologetic entitled "Dispensationalism Today." At that time Dispensationalism presented a unified front, and all of its opponents were to be found outside that system, mostly within Covenant theology camp of Reformed churches, and thus Ryrie's apologetic was directed at them. But the situation has changed dramatically since then, and now Ryrie's brand of Dispensationalism must contend with new opponents from within the camp -- even from the very institution where Ryrie himself was schooled in the system, and where he held court as one of its preeminent instructors for many years. ¶ On the back cover of the book we read a quote from Ryrie: "Dispensationalism dying? Hardly -- read on." Unfortunately, the book as a whole does not confirm Ryrie's confidence. If the older forms of Dispensationalism are not actually dying, they are certainly suffering from advanced hardening of the arteries and even severe atrophy. A patient in such a condition cannot have high hopes for longevity. This new volume could easily be subtitled "Dispensationalism Yesterday" for all the hope it extends to the future of the system it defends. Some of its more noteworthy essays are as follows: ¶ Ryrie's own "Update on Dispensationalism," which forms the first chapter, attempts to address what he believes are the weakest points of the new Progressive Dispensationalism (PD). Here he is strongest when he questions whether PD truly qualifies as Dispensationalism at all, and this is an issue that will have to be discussed and explored in future literature. But he is weakest when he challenges PD on its individual conclusions. ¶ Ryrie's rather icy contribution is followed by "Dispensational Hermeneutics," by Thomas Ice, who defends the method of literal interpretation, but does not deal with historic Dispensationalism's own failure to consistently apply that method. ¶ "The Biblical Meaning of Fulfillment," by Charles Dyer, is somewhat better, but disappoints by failing to deal with the crucial issue of initial or partial fulfillment. The Dispensational bias of using the Old Testament as its hermeneutical starting point also comes through loud and clear, which simply begs the very important question of whether this is the most appropriate place to start when defining "fulfillment" in the New Testament sense of the word. ¶ John F. Walvoord's "Biblical Kingdoms Compared and Contrasted" is helpful, but the questions he's raised have been answered in the book "Progressive Dispensationalism," by Craig A. Blaising and Darrell L. Bock. ¶ By far the worst contribution to this volume is found in "The New Covenant," by John R. Master, who very nearly (if not actually) returns to Lewis Sperry Chafer's long-discredited "Two New Covenant" theory to explain how the New Testament could apply the language of Jer. 31:31-34 (a prophecy addressed to ethnic Israel) to the church. ¶ Zane C. Hodges is up to his usual habits of incendiary overstatement in "A Dispensational Understanding of Acts 2." The credibility of his essay decreases as his use of hyper-emotional rhetorical slams increases. ¶ It's not that this book is a totally lost cause. There is some good stuff here, and even some tentative attempts at dialogue with the PD viewpoint, even though they sometimes seem artificial, and perhaps forced by the fact that the advocates of Classical and Revised Dispensationalism may feel backed into a corner, and are beginning to notice the substantial thinning of their ranks. ¶ Meanwhile the book serves the useful purpose of providing us with something to gauge the size of the fault-lines along which the world of Dispensationalism is currently dividing. It also shows how as paradigms shift, thought patterns that refuse to jump over to the new paradigm begin to harden and fossilize. The main question, I believe, is: as conservative evangelicals continue to make progress in the field of biblical hermeneutics, will Dispensationalists have any share in that progress, or will they be left behind? At this point the train is leaving the station, and many have yet to climb on board.

I've checked out this book from the library many times and am saddened to see that it's out of print. I would very much like to have my own copy of this book. Although it is nearly 10 years old, and thus deals with issues occurring back then (this is why I only give it 4 stars), it will help the Bible student answer some questions regarding dispensationalism and the kingdom of God. In fact, a reading of this book might cause those who are considering progressive dispensationalism (is it actually dispensationalism?) to see why the traditional view of dispensationalism makes good sense of history and the future. It answers some of the errors of progressive dispensationalism in advance, showing that Christ is not presently seated on the Davidic throne. (Progressives have yet to demonstrate where Scripture shows the Davidic throne as a heavenly throne; it is always pictured as a purely earthly throne.) This book is extremely helpful for those who are seriously considering the implications and some of the issues of Dispensationalism.

A valuable overview of a wide variety of Dispensational thought by many competent scholars within the Dispensational Community. I especially like the chapters on "Dispensational Hermeneutics" and "Israel and the Church."

Revelation is a neglected book within the church. Even Calvin never preached from it. Talbert attempts to make the book more readable and accessible to Christians today. What is troubling is his reliance on extra-biblical apocalyptic literature, especially when it suits his purpose. For example, as to the authorship of the book, Talbert claims that all we can say is that it was written by someone named John (not necessarily the Apostle). He assumes this despite some strong historic evidence pointing to the Apostle. However, he appeals to these sources when defending the cannonicity of the book. By way of another example, when the question of the millennial reign of Christ is addressed, Talbert admits it not based solely upon the text, but because other, extra-biblical, apocalyptic literature. Despite these difficulties, no call them slight discomforts, with the book, Talbert handles the text fairly well. This book would best be used with a solid, orthodox, Reformed commentary.

Professor Talbert aims "to offer aid to those who are scarred by harmful readings of Revelation and to encourage mainstream Christians to deal with Apocalypse in ways other than ignoring it." In my opinion, he succesfully delivers what he promised. This book is concise and easy to read but is not just "preaching to the choir." It is an erudite, well written essay, adjusted to modern biblical exegesis yet accesible to a broad audience.

This book is always recommended in Brazil for undergraduates and it gives an overview of Latin America's main countries. It is a great factual book, so don't expect deep analysis of history. It is highly reccomended for anyone that doesn't know a thing about the region and it is very simple and clear.

This is a long, short resume of the history of Latin America since the Independence to 1980. Highly recomended, since it is one of the best history writers from the territory. Good luck with it.

The most pictures I've seen from the Titanic and the events surrounding its demise. If you aren't into reading detailed accounts and love pictures then this book is perfect for you. Each page is filled with numerous pictures and a brief description of the people and events involved and how it plays into the whole story. Two thumbs way up. One of my favorites.

The most pictured from the Titanic and the events surrounding its demise. If you aren't into reading detailed accounts and love pictures then this book is perfect for you. Each page is filled with numerous pictures and a brief description of the people and events involved and how it plays into the whole story. Two thumbs way up. One of my favorites.

Very rare that authors can keep a story fresh. But somehow Charles Haas and Jack Eaton manage to turn up new exciting finds in the story of the Titanic. Buy this book!