Prince William was born on June 21,1982, and was christened William Arthur Philip Louis. Both parents were very much hands-on parents. With such an energetic nature and getting into much mischief such as dumping wastebaskets, flushing his father's shoes down the toilet, pushing the button which set off the palace alarms,etc., prompted his mother once to call him a "mini- tornado." It is difficult to imagine that this young, charming, handsome prince was such a little monster that his detectives had to devise a way to keep tack of him.
It was not long before his mother, Princess Diana, shortened his name to Wills who was very thrilled when his brother, Prince Harry, was born on September 15, l984. The two princes were and remain extremely close today.
For me, it was interesting to note that as a child Prince William was the only youngster who lost a race at a birthday party because he was the only child who refused to cheat. This says much for his character as a very young boy and for the character of his parents - Diana in particular since she was with him more.
Wills' parents broke with royal tradition and sent him off to boarding school as other aristocratic British boys. This probably helped contibute to his becoming much more well-rounded, and the popular young prince that he is today. He is much more liked than most royals before him. Prince William possess his mother's shy charm, poise, good-looks,etc., but, even more important, he knows that he has a role and destiny in life to be crowned king of England one day.
Prince William excels in academics, as well as, in many sports as no royal before him. Even within the royal family, he is considered the most popular and the most handsome which has not gone to his head.
As young as he is, he has had his share of heartbreak and pain. When Princess Diana drove to Ludgrove in December, 1992, to inform her son that she and Charles had decided to separate, he told his mother, "I hope you both will be much happier now." P.36 His most dreadful sorrow came on August 31, l997, when his father, Prince Charles, awakened him and told him that his beloved mother had been killed in a car crash. Publicly, Prince William handled the situation well; although, heartbroken, he returned to Eton just a few days after her funeral and several days after the opening of school. Wills seems to have matured far beyond his years into a young man who has inherited the best characteristics of each of his parents.
This book is a must for all regardless of whether you are a fan of the young, handsome Prince William. There's so much information crammed into this small, short book. It's hardcover and has only 78 pages. It includes many colorful photograghs of his immediate family - Princess Diana, Prince Charles, Prince Harry, and, of course, Prince William from his toddler years to the present. The book is about three and a fourth inches by four inches. There's much, much more in this book. I thought I knew almost all there was to know about Prince William, but there is more.
Catherine lead the Russians in the battle for the Crimea, eventually winning the region for the empire. The book also goes extensively into the many loves of Catherine. But short of using them to define who the Tsarina was, Troyat treats them as the diversion that Catherine saw them as.
Catherine saw herself as a liberal monarch. In fact, she regularly corresponded with Volraire and Diderot. But in the end, Catherine's main accomplishment was the maintain the power of the monarchy.
First, it a collection of letters, with a few pages of text from the editor. These pages help place the letters into the context of Collins' and Kiernan's life.
Second, the editor didn't edit the letters (though there are few comments to explain a few obscure references); thus the reader is allowed to read the text with a minimum of "outside interruptions"; some people may not like this.
Third, there are a few photographs and samples of handwriting included. The photographs were what one would expect; they included the couple, as well as some mutual friends. What intrigued me more than the photos, were the samples of handwriting. Collins and Kiernan both referred to their pages as "quick notes" and such, yet the pages contained few cross outs and changes which indicated that that both writers gave their "quick notes" quite a bit of thought.
These letters are remarkable, as they allow the reader to see how the events impacted the writers; especially true for Collins, as he was quite dedicated to writing letters to Kiernan in addition to his duties. It is remarkable to read these notes from a man whose time was consumed by governmental duties, treaty negotiations and fighting yet still found the time to tell his beloved how much he loved her.
This volumne is a rare bird, as it both a book for historians and for lovers. Enjoy
de Mariaga doesn't dwell long on Catherine's formative years, dealing with the entire period from German childhood to ascension to the Russian throne in the prologue. She does mention the effect that Plutarch, Tacitus and Montesquieu had on the fifteen year Catherine. When the Swede, Count Gyllenborg urged her to read these authors, Catherine acted on the suggestion by ordering the library of the Academy of Sciences and its bookshop be sent to her. The books, when they came, were over the head of a fifteen-year old, but she turned to them later in life. de Mariaga tells us that years later, while awaiting news from Potemkin during the second Turkish campaign, Catherine (along with her newest consort, Zubov) distracts herself by translating Plutarch' Lives.
Catherine had to deal with many powerful factions when she came to power, following Peter II's secret assassination by the Orlov's. Some of the aristocratic members of her early cabinet, especially Panin, were hoping for a parliamentarian form of government, with a select few advisors wielding the majority of the power. Catherine, with the backing of the Orlovs, displayed her mettle early on in circumventing such notions. As far as she was concerned, Russia would remain an an autocrcy. Yet she was diplomatic enough not to appear heavy-handed in her decision-making and gave the impression, even to those she disagreed with strongly, that she was considering their proposals. She gave into Panin on his idea of a councl, but it was to be fashioned by her, so the old idea of service to the sovereign was reinforced. Even so it took her a good five years to consolidate her authority and spoil the ambitions of those who wanted to keep her a figurehead regent serving only until the czarevich Paul reached his majority.
de Mariaga stresses the importance of the assembly of 1767 in helping validate Catherine's rule and cementing her government. The assembly was important in that it allowed Catherine to come in contact with a wide cross-section of the Empire, and allowed her to confer new status on previously disenfranchised segments of the population (except the serfs, of course), at the expense of the nobility. The nobility found itself unable to resist Catherine's power-grab, for she was now speaking directly to "her children" with the divine voice of the Enlightenment. To have denounced her plan before a national assembly would have been tantamount to denouncing providence itself.
Catherine epitomized the "enlightened despot." She combined the "enlightened" political model of Montesqieu with her own brand of absolute power. A case could be made that she wasn't so much power-hungry as unwilling to share policy-making with those less-enlightened than she; namely, the Russian nobility whom she saw (correctly) as interested primarily in maintaining their wealth and status.
Catherine corresponded frquently with Voltaire. She brought Diderot to Russia. She wrote voluminously on subjects ranging from political science to drama. She was a Rennaissance Man in woman's garb in an Age of Enlightenment. Her diplomatic skills were exemplary. She could be ruthless and iron-fisted when the occasion dictated it. She, like Peter the Great before her, forged a new Russia, less dependent on old superstitions and the whip, more attuned to education and the new humanism. While her sexual proclivities have been vastly over-sensationalized, it could well be stated that in the area of bedroom-diplomacy Cleopatra was her only rival.
Again, if you are a reader interested in good story-as-bio, stick to Troyat. If you are interested in the political panorama of 18th c. Russia, de Mariaga is the best guide I know of.
Even recipes of which I was skeptical have turned out to be just delicious. I've had several other lowfat cookbooks and plenty of chicken cookbooks, but this has become my hands-down favorite. When I say these recipes are delicious, I mean absolutely yummy delicious!
If you love chicken (like I do) and want new and different ways to cook it, you can't go wrong with this cookbook. As my daughter described tonight's dinner (Sauteed Chicken with Carrots and Onions), it's "yum-a-licious!"
List price: $27.50 (that's 30% off!)