Three sections include research on: Mind as Computer, Mind as Neural Network and Mind as Brain. Each section has well known authors: the two Churchlands, Chomsky, Putnam, Searle and (interestingly) Alan Turing. I have not see such an easy way to quickly find such diverse research on Cognative Science.
This research is generally "materialist" (e.g., scientific methods of observations are used to form theories) and a "dualist" (who believes mind is non-physical) will probably not agree with much of this scientific form of Philosophy of Mind.
I find this book useful for artificial intelligence research and design of future computers. Also, the ideas in the paper on *engrams* was used in science fiction's "Star Trek" to explain the (fictional) M-5 advanced computer. The book may also be found in the "Linguistics" section of book stores -- note Chomsky and Putnam both have several papers presented here.
The main reason why I can not give _five stars_ is because the most recent functional MRI papers are not included (although there are seven pared where MRI is mentioned. Yet, this is a "foundational history" book, not current research. Also, it is heavy in philosophy of Mind (good) and _not just_ pure science observation and explanatory theories only.
The writing is well-constructed; the author uses everyday language to describe complex and scientific information. His use of the Pink Panther theme as an example for the various topics is a helpful one. He does provide a great level of detail about brain function, the science of sound, perceptual processes, and other expert facts that can overwhelm the reader. He also seems to get lost in the forest of science at the expense of the phenomenological experience of enjoying music. There is, in fact, little discussion of the ecstasy in the title. There is far more Brain than Music or Ecstasy in this volume. It is, nevertheless, a well-written book that serves as a condensation of past writings on the topic and an invitation for further explorations of human reactions to music.
In addition, he explains where we localize different aspects of muscial experience, and why our individual experiences of rhythm, meter, melody and harmony differ. He wraps it all up against the backdrop of the lives and works of many prolific composers and suggests plausible answers the why the evolution of western music seems to have stalled where it is and what we may hope the future to hold.
In examining my own compositions with regard to Jourdains assertions about the neurological basis for musical experience, it becomes obvious why subtle differences in structure and style result in profound differences in the levels of audience appreciation, and for different audiences.
Jourdain's book has not only helped me become a better composer, but has helped realize and re-commit myself to developing the vast intellectual and creative potential that lies in this organ each of us has between our ears.