In the early 1990's, when the Internet was about to be discovered by mainstream media, I found this book (then already ten years old) in a friend's bookshelf. I started reading a chapter about some `Midnight Irregulars' and immediately recognized what the author was describing - it was the friendly computer network environment of the early 80's, when the event of the user `guest' logging in from a remote site didn't automatically trigger every alarm bell at the computer center, but was rather seen as a manifestation of innocent curiosity.

That was enough for me to want to read the whole book. The author, a Frenchman working as something of a computer consultant in the USA, relates his experiences from twenty years of interaction with computer users, at a time when they were probably a lot fewer than a million worldwide. His choice of subject may seem narrow to the general reader, but the book gave me a nostalgic kick, reminding me of my own feelings with regard to thi! s environment back around 1980.

Although covering approximately the same timespan as Steven Levy in `Hackers: Heroes of the Computer Revolution', Vallee mentions the hackers only in passing. Still, he manages to describe many features of the hacker culture, but from the perspective of a scientist and casual witness.

"Computer scientists have documented everything except their own work" Vallee claims, and then tries to fill a few gaps. While nowhere near a complete work on the history of computing, this book provides a number of revealing snapshots from places and events remembered by few today, told in an entertaining manner. The reader gets to learn about a French 1970's neo-luddite movement for the destruction of computers, about the endless discussions between French and American delegations on the standardization of computer terminology, and about a nun with a pretty sophisticated idea on the ergonomic design of desktop video terminals.

With this history! as background, the author goes on to make a number of pred! ictions about the future, some of which seem remarkably accurate today. Our hardware may be thousands of times faster, but have we really made any significant progress since this book was written? Those who fail to learn the lessons of computer history are doomed to be stuck in an infinite loop.

If you worked with mainframe computers in the academic environment before 1984, this book is for you. Others may enjoy it too.

This book is an interesting overview of the UFO phenomenon. I recommend this book for people curious about UFOs, who haven't done extensive reading on the subject. It primarily focuses on UFO phenomena in the United States, with a very good section on the U.S. government's official response to UFOs.

Particularly useful is the glossary of terms and institutions in the back of the book. It helped me keep all the various government agencies and projects straight. Bill Yenne does a very good job of presenting the evidence and letting the reader decide for themself. If you are looking for a good book to introduce you to UFO evidence, I recommend you start here.

The fact that Vallee decided to write (cooperate) on a 'fiction novel' (not seen from Vallee since his youth) is a curious note in and of itself. Fast Walker is a somewhat focused story while thinly woven around a 'balanced' set of characters, representing the UFO genre, more prevalent in the Eighties. The lives of an abductee; a UFO writer/researcher; a military 'working group' and a fanatical UFO cult leader all converge toward a climax as the plot thickens. The book is quite useful for contrasting various elements of the UFO scene while creating a sense of 'being there.' The outlook portrayed in the end raises a battery of questions and an alternate theory for the UFO question when compared to recent, mainstream thought. Entertaining.

Basically, Vallee takes his own theories on what UFOs are all about and slots them into a "fictional" account. (Like that other "fiction" book ALIEN RAPTURE). Vallee is big on deception, the idea that aliens aren't really alien at all but something else and are tricking us into thinking so.

The ideas are interesting, but as a story, the book is kind of lame.