most chapers include:
a slight review on the body system that the drug affects such as the first few chapter have to do with cholinergic drugs on the nervous system followed by a few paragraphs about each drug what it does, what is used for theriputically and adverse affects, also there is some times an antidote. if you are looking for a good book stop because this is easy to undersand and has a ton of information
-Andrew
most chapers include:
a slight review on the body system that the drug affects such as the first few chapter have to do with cholinergic drugs on the nervous system followed by a few paragraphs about each drug what it does, what is used for theriputically and adverse affects, also there is some times an antidote. if you are looking for a good book stop because this is easy to undersand and has a ton of information
-Andrew
It's not "the best book I've ever read," nor is it the SPECWAR primer that Rogue Warrior is. But for some unadulterated macho fun, Green Team (like the others in the series) can't be beat.
List price: $14.00 (that's 64% off!)
Will comes home after his grandfather's death to take control of the family business. While there, he discovers something awful; his grandfather was probably having an affair with a woman named Lillian. For Christmas, his grandmother asks Will to find this Lillian so that they can make things straight and discover the truth. Will goes on a quest to find the mystery woman, but the quest also turns into a discovery of himself as he will learn how to enjoy life and how to really love again.
The book has some very touching moments and the story is quite engaging; it still was able to surprise me in the end. This is the perfect book to read around Christmas time; it will lift your spirits and put you in the mood for the most wonderful time of the year... Guaranteed!
Kids I know like this book.
I like Madeline the character a lot more than I like the books. I've found that very few writers can write wonderful verse, and I don't include Bemelmans in that august company. Some of his rhymes flow nicely together, such as the opening lines of the first book:
In an old house in Paris that was covered with vines lived twelve little girls in two straight lines. Some of his rhymes are jarring:
and soon after Dr. Cohn came, he rushed out to the phone, and he dialed : DANton-ten-six --
'Nurse,' he said, 'it's an appendix!' Everybody had to cry --
not a single eye was dry. . . . Madeline woke up two hours
later, in a room with flowers.
Still, the story isn't bad. A brave little girl is rushed to the hospital, has her appendix out, then shows off her scar. She makes it so exciting that all the other girls want their appendix out, too. Even my daughter wanted to have an appendix scar, until I explained just what that would entail.
Casually written in the author's own voice, this sojourn goes to many surprising places, and the writing style, difficult for me to follow at times, faithfully mirrors the confusion, dislocation, and transportation out of which this clever book was written.
We need more books that not only tell us, but show us, that personally lived versions of the Hero's Journey are needed to get to the truths that really work for us.
I can't review a book without commenting on the medium: shame, shame on the publishers and editors! The pages are cheap, thin, paper; the text runs all over the page; and the text has a number of typos and spelling errors that it's the house's job (not the author's) to correct. Do it right or don't do it at all.
The author calls for informal groups to discuss the problems of our nation and its place in the world. Amen! (...)
If you're young in spirit, this might be a good book for you to read.
Why? Because it raises questions and demands answers that in my case I didn't like being asked. To Live A Lie on page 216-227 is in itself worth the time required to read the book. It is just one example of how the author tweaks our comfort zone. In this case the typical suburban, upward mobile career person who from their home to work is sheltered in the car cocoon, and in their office and in their home and artificially shielded from the real world. The real world where ones child asks why poor people don't live in the nice type of house they live in.
I appreciated even though it hurt sometimes, his wisdom about race, economics, the sexes, and our nation. I don't agree with everything he espouses, but he addresses some serious issues in a thought provoking way, that I admit really made me think and look at my role in the scheme of things.
Because the writer takes us through time as well as through physical space, he is in a process of growth throughout his work. And because the writing is so vivid, sophisticated yet down-to-earth, we grow with him. Interestingly, he never really leaves home. As much as Mr. Joseph's yearning drive sends him across the United States and then across the world, he always returns, sometimes reluctant emotionally - to an unchanged Queens - where the unchanged view is fixed painfully in Richard Joseph's past. An ongoing connection between the larger picture and the smaller, between the mountain top and the valley - in which the valley's inhabitants cannot see - can never see - the view from the top of the mountain. Yet there is a constancy and an underlying love for family which holds Mr. Joseph in place; while finding his way through a whirling vortex of events and psychological change, is fundamental and draws him back to his roots, perhaps against even his own wishes.
We are a 'guy from Queens' when we first venture out from a movie like cityscape description of that setting. We see the hands of the crowd clawing at the window, trying to reach us with malice, when we are sick and feverish on the train in India. We feel the snake on our boot and the terror. We should all read this book. It is for everyone. Hopefully it is only his first book. You will be spellbound - as I was.
List price: $14.95 (that's 30% off!)
The quote above just about says it all. The book read like fiction and was carefully detailed. All of the medical terminology was easily understood and thoroughly explained. The authors stated that the theme of the book is "the emotionally-charged intersection of SIDS and infanticide."
Almost all of what we have known of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) for the last 20 years was based on work done by Dr. Alfred Steinschneider in upstate New York. His findings were based primarily on two children (Molly and Noah Hoyt) who died while under his care in the early 1970s, following the deaths of three of their siblings in previous years. Steinschneider thus "determined/concluded" that SIDS was familial and caused by apnea (pauses in breathing while sleeping). To combat these deaths, he pushed the use of home monitors for babies who were considered "at risk". His landmark paper in 1972 in The Journal of Pediatrics shaped medical thinking for the next 20 years. Yet he had used only a tiny sample and had no control group. This article and subsequent ones cleared peer review committees despite obvious flaws. He arranged facts to fit his theory over the next years. His fundamental deception/fabrication was that apnea episodes were documented in the hospital for the two children who died --but there was NO documentation!! In fact, Steinschneider had repeatedly ignored concerns of the pediatric nursing staff about the mother, Waneta Hoyt.
I found it incredible that a hypothesis was presented and accepted by the medical community based on only 5 cases and 2 deaths! I think this shows how desperate people were for a quick way to predict and prevent SIDS. Because of the prevalence and acceptance of this theory, Munchausen Syndrome by Prozy (when a parent, usually a mother, harms or kills a child, usually to get attention) was rarely considered when a very young child died.
In the next 20 years, the monitor business became a multi-million dollar business and many people got rich from it. Steinschneider himself never owned stock in any monitor company, but his research was underwritten by one of them, Healthdyne, whose fortunes then became dependent on the doctor's continuing research findings about apnea. A vicious circle! Also, leading SIDS researchers conducted seminars, which were funded by Healthdyne grants, then gave out information on monitors to the participants.
What particularly disturbed me was the fact that Dr. David Southall, from England, had refuted Steinschneider's theories and proven them to be false with very extensive research of his own But until the 1986 Apnea Consensus Conference, no one appeared to listen to him. This conference was the first time that Steinschneider's theory was formally investigated or questioned by an official group of his peers.
In the early 90s, a coincidental series of events led a district attorney in upstate NY to begin investigating the deaths of the Hoyt children. This led to the 1994 arrest and conviction of Waneta Hoyt for the murder of all five of her children. The authors make it clear that not only was the mother on trial for murder, but that Steinschneider's theory was also on trial.
The trial's outcome demonstrated that the entire premise for SIDS for the last 20 years was false. In the words of several prominent pediatric forensic specialists: if there is one infant death in a family, it is probably SIDS. Two deaths should be considered suspicious. Three deaths are homicide.
What was especially shocking to me was the information in this book about Massachusetts General Hospital's SIDS program. Mass General had positioned itself as "the" place to bring babies thought to be "at risk" for SIDS. Yet the program, run by Drs. Kelly and Shannon, disciples of Steinschneider, was governed by a false, 20- year-old theory. The pediatric department had had a long history of ignoring suggestions of child abuse, some of it fatal, when a young doctor named Tom Truman arrived for a research fellowship in pediatric critical care. Truman secretly investigated all of the deaths of children who were "at risk" and found that in 155 deaths which occurred after multiple "events" (instances of unconsciousness, etc.), Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy was never considered, even in one family when the "events" stopped after the children were placed in foster care.
The authors said: "In the Shannon-Kelly team, some [abusive] mothers found the allies they needed. In their babies, the doctors found the data they needed. Locked in this symbiosis, Mass General appears to have become a Munchausen haven, while contaminating the research of SIDS with highly dubious data."
I would highly recommend this book not only for its interesting subject matter but because it was so well done. The meticulous and documented research was presented in a scholarly yet easily-understood manner.
Story starts with the prosecution of Stephen Van Der Sluys for the death of his 16-month-old son in Upstate New York in 1977, asserting that the death was due to deliberate smothering by a parent and not the medically fashionable "Sudden Infant Death Syndrome." The "SIDS" Syndrome had considerable medical support. A National Sudden Infant Death Syndrome Foundation existed to increase general awareness, and the selling and use of breathing monitors for sleeping infants had become a big business. But prosecution expert Linda Morton, forensic pathologist from Dallas had seen many cases of child abuse that family physicians overlooked or attributed to SIDS. How many more cases of murder had been explained away by SIDS? And is SIDS something that can "run in a family"?
"Death Of Innocents" goes on to tell the disturbing story of the family of Waneta and Timothy Holt in which several infant children died SIDS-classifiable deaths occurred -- always privately when only Waneta Holt was alone with them. In 1994, Waneta Holt was tried for murders committed two decades earlier. The prosecution represents a case of law examining science. Alfred Steinschneider, M.D., Ph.D. had made a career out of SIDS and a portion of the data in one of his articles in a scientific journal had described the Holt family. Although the identity of the "SIDS" infant patients was masked, prosecutors were able to identify the cases from public health records. The discovery, case-building and trial make exciting reading. And beyond this, the story is fascinating because it is a case of Law correcting Science. Although many scientific experts had assumed that SIDS can "run in a family," there was no unimpeachable scientific evidence for this based on "near miss" SIDS episodes recorded be sleep/breathing monitors under controlled circumstances. The "scientific conclusion" of SIDS running in families was based more on assumption than on hard science or high epistemological standards. One expert's assumption became a mass of experts' unexamined opinions. The appearance of Dr. Steinschneider as a defense witness put his science on trial.
Firstman and Talan's "Death Of Innocents" is a truly momentous story. And like a mountain, their story can be viewed from its many aspects -- medical, scientific, legal and social. It is many stories -- of an attention-starved loser who kept killing her babies, of prosecutors who were not afraid to take on "medical scientists" and of the growth and modification of a medico- scientific theory. Firstman and Talan have produced an authoritative chronicle and encyclopedic work which will stand up to scrutiny from all directions.
The important take-home message from this book is that SIDS is, indeed, a natural and infrequent phenomenon. It can be a valid explanation for the loss of one infant in a family. But when a family loses a second infant to apnea (cessation of breathing), the circumstances must be examined very carefully.
List price: $17.00 (that's 30% off!)