List price: $12.00 (that's 20% off!)
Used price: $8.47
Buy one from zShops for: $8.47
On a side note A Refutation of Moral Relativism isn't too bad.
List price: $11.95 (that's 20% off!)
Used price: $3.95
Buy one from zShops for: $6.99
If you are searching and unsure of the Christian Faith, this is a book for you. If you approach this book with your mind made up already, then this book will largely be of little use to you- but that's true of anything. someone who absolutely refuses to believe in evolution will think darwin is an idiot no matter what he says or how clearly he expresses himself- even in places where he is irrefutable as well (and antibiotic-resistant bacteria alone shows he had some things right).
if you are more open-minded than that, this is a great and fast read.
The dialogue is not meant to simulate real-life conversation, but employs wit, irony, and logic to bring about the points that Kreeft wants to make - namely proving that God exists, explaining the problem of evil, Heaven, Hell and the other "big" questions.
For those that do not care to read dialogue-centered books this will not be for them.
For those seeking answers to such question, however, they will find that Kreeft does a masterful job of raising the tough questions and leading one to the true answers. This is a wonderful book for a beginning logic, philosophy, or theology student.
Used price: $1.00
Buy one from zShops for: $6.87
Used price: $8.00
Used price: $29.95
List price: $11.95 (that's 20% off!)
Used price: $4.85
Buy one from zShops for: $8.31
Used price: $13.72
Used price: $15.59
Used price: $19.95
Socratic Philosophy + Christian Fundamentalism = NONSENSE
I could not understand what logic Christians follow when they claim that such great philosophers as Socrates and Nietzsche are in any ways sympathizers of delusional Christian fundamentalism. If anything Socrates if present today will be a naturalistic freethinker, questioning the authority of the church and of the God himself. Such renowed Socratic phrase: "Is it moral because the God says so, or God say so because it is moral" clearly shows that morality and religion aren't identical. I am wondering, for example, how Socrates can feel anything but disgust after reading the old testament, where God commands to do such "moral things" as killing babies happily: "O daughter of Babylon, who art to be destroyed; happy shall he be, that rewardeth thee as thou hast served us. Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones." (Psalm 137:8-9)
Even in the New Testament, Socrates would find Jesus' arrogant remarks and ultimatums in no better light than he saw many Olympic gods. I don't see how, for example, after encountering such phrase as spoken by Jesus: "If a man abide not in me, he is cast forth as a branch, and is withered; and men gather them, and cast them into the fire, and they are burned." (John 15:6) Socrates would not arise with other feelings that resentment against such a dictatorial God.
In summary the "conclusions" seemed to be drawn from the premises were in much part through a fallacious way. And any person familiar with logic can easily see that. To claim that the real Socrates could ever drawn such fallacies is too insult this great philosopher.