Newman's sound warnings against the overreaching of scientific fields and the triumph of smug materialism and positivism are still urgent, of course. Newman is also careful to point out that the liberal arts and even theology may attempt to establish a single, inadequate framework for the discovery of truth.
Newman's complex epistemology does not fall prey to the heresy that truth is not one, but reminds us that in our present state, truth present various aspects and that the tyranny of any particular branch of knowledge is the victory of ignorance.
I felt that this was the most annoying thing. Lady Caroline's life was incredibly interesting. She turns up in the periphery of recent books such as Amanda Foreman's work on Ly. C's Aunt, Georgiana, Duchess of Devonshire. We also read a bit about her in Passion and Principle by Aiken Hodge. Both these writers were able to find the truth behind the myths she spread about herself - why couldn't a biographer spending a whole book on her?
I also found this book a little annoying as it purports to be about Lady Caroline, yet much of it is devoted to Byron - her very brief lover and almost life-long obsession. Her life went on after Byron, she wrote books, created other scandals, but it is almost like there was most information on Byron so Blyth chose to dedicate a large portion of his book to the poet.
Hopefully there will be another better biography out soon. Lady Caroline has only one other biography totally to herself and that was written by Elizabeth Jenkins in the 30's. It is about time someone rediscovered this most unapologetic of Regency tear-aways.
In short, if you read Lavengro and Romany Rye and couldn't get enough of them, then this book is worth it; I have read none of his others, (besides dipping into Wild Wales, which I also found dull) so I don't know if another would be better. Also, if you're really obsessed with Catholicism in the Mediteranean or Spain during that civil war, then you'll enjoy this book. Otherwise I wouldn't recommend it.
Unfortunately, this volume printed by IndyPublish.com is clearly a download from Project Guternberg or another website. It has CAPITALS where it should have italics, the formatting is poor for a reading book (gaps between the paragraphs rather than indents), and, most offensive, instead of a few passages in Greek, it has the words [Greek text which cannot be reproduced.] There are a dozen typographic errors. The margins are poorly laid out (the bottom margin should be larger than the top, not the other way around). Frankly, it looks almost as if the publisher didn't even proof the copy before sending it to press.
This volume is NOT worth the cover price. If you can find it published by any other source, the book is worth reading. If not, download it and read it that way -- at least you won't have the affront of having paid good money for a lazily produced volume.
at best, it's an incredibly interesting study of not only a language but also the development of the language. I say it's racist because it does, at times, approach the Rom as inferior to Whites, but that was the standard attitude at the time. For the most part, the book is respectful and scholarly. It's also outdated in that much better work has been published -- most of which using "lavo lil" as a starting point. In addition, the book contains a lot of "tinker" patois... that is, slang of the area (great britain) as opposed to Romany.
I didn't expect to see this book listed on Amazon.com, but decided to do a quick search anyway. Here it is! I recomend buying this book if you are interested in the Rom, or in linguistics.