Let me put it this way: On the first practice test I got a 98% (790) in the analytical section. On the second, my results were 44% (500). Gee, that's a pretty big gap, especially for someone who does fairly complicated logic puzzles in under fifteen minutes. Either I'm going crazy (which is entirely possible) or this book is dreadfully uneven with the difficulty of its problems and its wording is vague (not to mention answers and explanations in the verbal section that are just plain WRONG even when I asked English instructors their opinion). Either way, I'm giving it one big fat star (which is one big fat star too many in my opinion).

This is probably the saddest study on Alexander the Great I have ever read. Ashley wants us - seriously - to believe Nearchos' fleet battled with Neanderthal men. A misreading of Arrian by the author has convinced him that Aristobulus was the son of the Indian King Poros. There are major and minor mistakes on almost every page. At the price of 60 US dollars, you should really look for a better book.

I'm sorry, but this is as it is.

A nice enough voice but very poor recording,a lack of media production and completely without conviction or individual style. There must be a better way of reproducing such classical
material.