M.
II. After an assassination attempt, Spinoza managed to get excommunicated from the Amsterdam synagogue in 1656. Q.E.D.
III. Spinoza turned down prestigious university posts and instead made his living grinding glass lenses. At the same time he composed a classic metaphysical system that he also applied to a political system. Q.E.D.
IV. Spinoza was one of the first philosophers to claim that the aim of the state is individual freedom. Q.E.D.
V. Though Spinoza's metaphysics belong to a different time, it is an example of how a theory of existence can be applied to a manner of living and being. Q.E.D.
VI. This book provides a good but very short introduction to the life and philosophy of one of the most interesting philosophers in the history books. Q.E.D.
VII. Spinoza managed to live a very humble life and still attain fame and recognition in his own time. He corresponded with Huygens, Newton, Leibniz, and other eminent people of the 17th century. Q.E.D.
VIII. Spinoza's works were so controversial they were either not published during his lifetime or published anonymously shortly after his death. Q.E.D.
IX. Spinoza's metaphysical system was based on pantheism, which posited that everything and everyone is God, so that if you hurt another you hurt yourself. There are corollaries to the modern Gaia hypothesis in this. Q.E.D.
X. This book will leave you wanting to know more about Spinoza and why he wrote in a strange numbered aphoristic manner. It can be read in a single reading and will acquaint you with Spinoza and why he is considered important. Q.E.D.
XI. Read this book, then move onto more thorough studies if it catches your interest. Q.E.D.
My advice - dispense with the "industry" of philosophy altogether, and especially its pathetic popularized forms. If you're not up to trying to read Heidegger (or any philosopher, dead or alive) himself, then just stay out of philosophy altogether.
Strathern also rightly raises the active and eager Nazism of Heidegger in the thirties that was indeed related to his philosophical ideas (p.62), although Strathern chivalrously tries to salvage the pure core of Heidegger's ideas from Nazi affinity. Finally, Strathern does not shrink back from recounting the failure of integrity and character seen in Heidegger's turning his back on his Jewish philosophical mentor Husserl during the Nazi era (p. 60) and from recounting the deception involved in Heidegger's lengthy adulterous relation with his much younger student Hannah Arendt (pp. 35-40).
Let me begin by saying any attempt to condense Heidegger's life and thought into 90 minutes is a cross between desperation and ridiculousness (someone like Woody Allen might say that St Peter would use it as a test to see who got into Philosopher's Heaven). I remember that trying to read three pages (sometimes three sentences) of Being and Time in 90 minutes was like speed-reading, and I still consider reading any part of Sein und Zeit to be a superb exercise for developing mid-term memory and cognition. To paraphrase Boswell, the miracle about "Heidegger in 90 Minutes" is not that it's done well, but that someone tried to do it at all.
Well, all that aside, I suppose this is as good an attempt as any, but don't get your expectations up. Strathern is heavy on the dark side of Heidegger's life (his Naziism, his ethical derelictions, his occasional philosophical and personal ridiculousness) but light on the good side of Heidegger (I don't think you will be able to impress a knowledgeable person with your knowledge of Heidegger by reading this book, if the subject should come up in a bar). He gives a reasonably good critique of Heidegger's thought and he focuses reasonably well on Heidegger's emphasis on Being as philosophy's major raison d'etre.
In summary, I think it's well worth the 90 minutes as an introduction, but don't plan on using it to write any essays for your philosophy class. Check out the internet, any good summary book of German philosophy, and the recent autobiography by R. Safranski. Make sure your pencils are sharp and your erasers plentiful. Bring a sense of humor and don't drive while listening to the audiotape (you won't fall asleep, but you won't pay attention to your driving, either).
Unfortunately, the mathematical and technical stuff in the book are only described very vaguely - I did not understand how the Enigma code was cracked, or how the proofs concerning computability worked. I am not quite sure whether the author understood what he was writing about.
I wanted an idea of what I was getting myself into before I clawed my way thru "Thus Spake Zarathustra" and this was just the book to get my attention. Some of my favorite quotes by Nietzsche aren't included, but they really aren't that important for achieving a basic understanding.
If you are really into philosophy, you probably aren't buying the "90 Minute" books. If you are doing graduate level work, you'd better not be in the "90 Minute" books. If you're taking philosophy at a community college just because you like taking classes, this book may save you a lot of time.
I liked it, I still use it, but I don't rely on it!