The author presents confused arguments
against several of the core tenets of
modern physics and cosmology.
In particular, he argues that Einstein's
theory of relativity (which, for some reason,
he attributes largely to Hawking) does not
stand up to the test of "commonsense".

He appears to be unaware that the theory was
proposed in response to the complete failure
of "commonsense" to explain or accommodate
various observed physical phenomena, such as
the results of the 1880 and 1887 Michelson-Morley
experiments.

Since then, the commonsense Newtonian theory has
been flatly and repeatedly contradicted by our
observations of the real world, whereas Einstein's
theory has withstood thousands of stringent
experimental tests and has also been a central
ingredient in the development of much modern
technology. This does not yet prove that the
theory is correct, but it's an impressive record;
and it makes little sense now to argue against
relativity simply on the grounds that it defies
commonsense.

Apart from being apparently unaware of the enormous
body of supporting experimental evidence, the author
clearly has no grasp at all of the mathematical
basis of relativity (which is central to its
understanding). Instead, he has seized upon various
quotes from popular books - as though these quotes
themselves constituted the theory - and proceeded
to interpret and lampoon them in his own
idiosyncratic manner.

Skepticism is a normal and healthy reaction to
theories as counter-intuitive as relativity;
indeed, informed and thoughtful skepticism are
invaluable to the on-going development of science
and make for very interesting reading.
Unfortunately, the criticisms offered in this book
cannot be described as either well-informed or
thoughtful. The author freely acknowledges his lack
of expertise, but apparently regards this a virtue.

This is the most unilluminating and uninformative
book on modern physics I have seen. I dread to think
what the author might come up with if he hears about
quantum mechanics!

This book is unfortunately worthless. Not because its viewpoint contradicts scientific knowledge of the day, but because its reasoning is so shaky and flawed. Technobabble: that is all you need as summary.

Although getting a book published is an admirable feat for the average Joe, I must say that such is the only thing admirable about this author's endeavor.

Without really any scientific or mathematical backing, the author talks circles around some of the most groundbreaking work in the area of physics in modern times. Rather than dispute such work with logic, however, this author uses doublespeak and "common-sense" analogies to dissuade the reader from believing what the greatest minds on the planet have asserted using mathematics, physics, logic, and the scientific process... to dissuade the reader, often, from believing much-proven fact.

Whatever the motivation, this author's irresponsible work makes for an interesting read if one wishes to see what not to do when making an argument.

If one is looking for an intelligent, persuasive, or piqueing new look at theories often taken for granted, one shuold definately look elsewhere.