List price: $27.99 (that's 30% off!)
List price: $29.99 (that's 30% off!)
List price: $14.99 (that's 30% off!)
Destructively, biblical criticism has been used to discredit the Bible or say that people couldn't agree, or that the writers themselves were confused, or that things didn't happen if they disagree.
Stein offers a great alternative: maybe the authors chose to put together the material differently (if there are differences) to make different emphases. Stein notes that Matthew has a more chronological order (using the Greek word 'tote' [then]), whereas Luke uses 'kai' [and], possibly indicating the author's redaction to make a more logical argument.
Stein also addresses issues of biblical criticism in general, dating of the material, how to make sense of quite a few passages and finding emphases.
It's a good reference book for the pastor and the theological student (e.g., seminarian and educated lay-readers) who want to know a strongly scholarly evangelical response.
Stein adopts a rigorously empirical approach, employing a variety of data sources, but primarily relying on an International City Managers Association survey and Census Bureau data. Stein finds that, indeed the organizational structure of urban service delivery matters for the fiscal performance of municipalities. Alternative service delivery will, in general, reduce expenditures, lower employment rates and reduce wage rates for municipal governments. The primary mechanism for this is the lower benefit and wage packages offered to workers by non-municipal service providers. Stein concludes that these mechanisms offer municipalities a method for continuing to deliver public services even when these services conspire against their fiscal well-being.
Stein makes a real contribution to our knowledge of urban management and policy in this study. This is a book that should be read by anyone with an interest in the future of American cities. However, the methodological and theoretcial sophistication of the tome will prevent a wider audience. The exhaustive quantitative aspect of the study at times threaten to overwhelm the reader. Further, the theoretical arguments are such that the book could be troublesome for use in all except the most advanced undergraduate courses. Graduate courses in urban policy, however, should benefit greatly from this book. Finally, a minor criticism: the index is a bit less detailed that that called for by such an incisive and in-depth contribution.
The first section of this book discusses the literary relationship of the synoptic gospels. After establishing the clear literary dependence between the synoptics, Stein provides a very compelling argument for the priority of Mark and its subsequent utilization as a source for Matthew's and Luke's gospels. Those unfamiliar with Markan priority will learn a great deal from this section. The existence of Q as a written work is the next topic tackled. Objections to Markan priority and the existence of Q are handled well.
The second section covers form criticism and the oral transmission of the gospel materials prior to their use in written form. This area will again be very informative to those new to the topic. In the final section, Dr. Stein discusses redaction criticism and its applicability to hermeneutics. Stein comes from a conservative theological background, so I'm sure some conservative readers may be questioning whether or not critical scholarship is of any use. Clearly the author believes that it is, and I would agree. As for the issue of biblical authority, Stein believes that although Matthew and Luke used Mark as a source, and also that they altered their source in some cases, Matthew and Luke provide an inspired translation of Mark in those parallel passages where one writer differs from another.
This is an excellent resource for anyone interested in studying the relationship between the synoptic gospels. I know I'll be referring to it for a long time.