Like many Americans, I scan the news of the third world more than I read it. So I opened this book in part to see if the sweeping generalizations about sub-Saharan Africa I'd come to believe, more through osmosis than analysis, were true or needed revision. The conclusion, unfortunately, is that it's even worse than I thought. Corruption, disease, political instability, economic chaos, genocide are all part-and-parcel of Africa four decades after independence (give or take a few years, country to country). Schwab catalogues the horrors, citing statistics, anecdotal evidence, his own visits to the continent, and colors his reporting with excerpts from African novelists (going a little bit overboard with those references, actually).

He's careful to introduce the book with a review of the hand Africa was dealt: slavery; colonialism; and the treatment of African countries as pawns on the capitalist vs. communist chessboard of the cold war. However, the author's implicit argument is that this should not have led inevitably to the current situation. The title after all says self-destructs. Schwab's criticism is largely of greedy and brutal African dictators that have pillaged their own countries. While he hardly lets the industrialized world off the hook, and is especially critical of U.S. foreign-policy neglect of sub-Saharan states (South Africa excepted), he lays much of the blame clearly at the feet of African despots.

While not discounting the enormity of the problems, he does lay out some actions the U.S. can take to reduce the misery and privation. Debt relief and support for the few honest and forthright heads of state who are in place or rise to positions of leadership are prime recommendations.

...

This is an important book, a Western book and a personal book. Important, because it should be read by many in Washington. The cynic in me doubts that it will be -- Africa's off the radar screen right now, and I shudder to think what might put it back on. Western, because an argument can be made for a more Zen or "Star Trek" approach to societies less technologically developed: leave them alone to work it out on their own. Our own predispositions, today's political threats and the humanitarian instincts of many in the West probably preclude that happening now. Personal, because toward the end, Schwab eloquently describes the spirit of hope, idealism and opportunity that Peace Corps volunteers, businessmen, and academics carried with them on their visits to Africa immediately following independence. It's hard not to wonder, in a moment of armchair psychology, about the emotional effect Africa's current morass must have on someone like Schwab who was in the vanguard during that hopeful time of the 1960s.

The current condition of Africa is in pretty bad shape, lagging behind other parts of the thirds world. How did Africa reach this condition since it is where civilization began? Peter Scwab tries to to figure out what's wrong with Africa. He first visited Africa as a peace core volunteer in the early 1960s and has returned to the continent after that. He goes through time looking at the problems the contient has had. He starts by looking at the slave trade and how it perpetuated war among the various different ethnic groups so they could aquire slaves to sell to slave traders. Often, guns were brought in as payment only further increasing the warfare. Then colonialism came to basically economcially exploit the continent and creating an infrastructure that was better suited for the mother country then the colony. As a result of colonial lines, waring ethnic and religious groups were put toghether. Intentional or not, these divisions still cause problems to the present day. The Cold War came in bringing new military aid further increasing warfare. Compound Africa's problems with numourous civil wars, brutal dictators and constant warfare amoung nations only makes the continent worse off. AIDS is a crises in sub-Sahara Africa will large numbers of people becoming infected with no signs of it stopping which places a large number of people at risk for early deaths. Compound this with the countries inability to pay for AIDS medications the legal barriers they have had to obtain these drugs through generic prescripation manufactorors. The growing level of globilization is leaving Africa behind more so than other parts of the third world. Africa faces problems with instable government and transportation problems. Other problems that Schwab deals with are famine, disease, problems with rainfall.

Provides a good account of African problems past and present.

Where present day Africa is concerned, it is easier to ignore what is unpleasant or to minimize it and to discredit those who present an accurate view of it. Dr. Schwab presents a well-organized body of information about recent history and political and social conditions in a country-by-country analysis with specifics that one would have to search for in a variety of sources, all in a concise and easy-to-navigate book. Clearly, one of his main concerns is the denial of both individuals and nations that the conditions in many African countries are relevant to us. His account of historical events is laced with relevant and appropriate quotes from notable African authors. This serves, not as a distraction to the astute reader, but rather as a reminder that these are human beings being affected by these events and not just statistics. Dr. Schwab's suggestions as to what the role of the superpowers should be and how the self-destruction of the nations he discusses could be averted, is, I believe, realistic and is based on the author's many years of scholarly work and direct experience which have provided him with extraordinary insight in this area.

This is 188 pages of political rhetoric by an author who, 1.) loves communism/collectivism, 2.) has disdain for U.S. concepts of human rights, and 3.) spends most of the book name-calling those who would disgree with him. He constantly mixes up facts with his own opinions. The ideas are also very disorganized, so even as a reference book, it is difficult to use.

It is one thing to say that a nation will do whatever is in its own interest, but quite another to persist in carrying out a foreign policy that has not done anything positive for the United States and has only made the Cuban people miserable. Peter Schwab's book provides detailed evidence of this fact in a variety of contexts. Dr. Schwab describes his experiences during his research in Cuba against the backdrop of a well-documented historical, political, sociological and cultural perspectives. In reality, his position is quite moderate, but may not seem so to those who are unable to see the reality of cause and effect through the blurred window of simplistic "good vs, evil" ideology. Read this book with an open mind and you will see that the embargo is counterproductive in every sense of the word. You will also get a more balanced view of the changes that have happened in both Cuba and to Castro himself over the past 43 years.

This book is well-organized, often conceptual rather than linear, which may require an slight adjustment for some readers. By addressing the diverse aspects of the U.S. embargo against Cuba in different contexts, Dr. Schwab is able to give us much more than the usual two-dimensional view we are usually offered regarding this topic.

This book is very interesting. It tells the Cuban side to the economic embargo. Schwab gives specific examples of how the U.S. embargo has hurt the Cuban people. He also provides an idea for an alternative to a U.S. dominated Cuba. Schwab gives us the side of the story that we don't hear from the U.S. government.

Dr. Schwab's relatively short book covers the highlights of Haile Selassie's long reign as emperor of Ethiopia. Unfortunately, there are many periods of Haile Selassie's life which receive short shrift- while the 1930s and 1960s/1970s are covered in some detail, the 1940s and 1950s are barely touched on. Furthermore, the author engages in a fair amount of psychological speculation as to Haile Selassie's motives at various points.

Good for research but not exactly coffee-table blurb.