It was short, it contained good character building, it had an uninteresting plot.

Not as good as I'd hoped, but you should read it anyway because of the insight on the character of Kathryn Janeway, wich repairs some of the damage caused by not-so-good plotting, short lenght and uninteresting side-characters.

Kathryn Janeway has always been a complicated personality. The Starfleet Academy novels reflect that nicely. I'm 27 years old and got a kick out of all three!

Excellent graphics. Great quality in the physical aspect of the book and the colored graphics contianed in it. But, it definitely does not help the beginner much. It jumps steps and the photographs do not help to decipher what the author is trying to explain. Not for the NOVICE

This book has 22 step-by-step demonstrations of all the basic-level aurbrush techniques! It says what type of airbrushes are used for what type of airbrushing! Picking an air source, airbrsuh, paint, painting surfaces and things you need to get started in both Illustration and T-shirt airbrushing! This is a book I have read 3 or 4 times and every time I read it I find out something new! This is a must for any airbrush artist or artist to be!

Well, all people, as parents, know that a child should be nutrured from a very young age. You should read to your child as often as possible, and try to spur his or her personal growth. This is one of the most important things in a child's life, and this book can help to guide a parent. More than even testing a child's IQ, it tests the parent's ability and dedication to their child. While some children are born with the natural abilites to learn at different rates, this book can help you classify both your child and yourself.

J. Gordon Melton in apparently now promoting the seventh edition of his book called the "Encyclopedia of American Religions."

But don't expect to see any meaningful critical analysis or fact-driven revelations within this tome. Instead the part-time teacher and library worker at the University of California in Santa Barbara, basically reiterates whatever religious groups tell him.

For example, you won't read that space aliens from another planet are the actual basis for Scientology's theology.

Why?

Because Scientology didn't tell Mr. Melton that and they don't want this information in his "encyclopedia"

Is this beginning to sound a bit specious for a supposedly scholarly effort?

Melton's book retails for [$$], which may partly explain its ranking at Amazon.com at well below 500,000.

However, Mr. Melton and his book got some good press recently in an article by Richard Ostling, carried by Associated Press.

What Ostling doesn't mention is the more sordid side of the author's work. Melton has often been called a "cult apologist."

In fact Mr. Melton refuses to use the term "cult." Instead he prefers to call groups like Scientology, Krishna and Ramtha, "new religions" or "new religious movements" (NRMs).

Maybe this is because they pay him.

Melton often works for groups called "cults," either through cult-funded "research projects," books or as an expert witness. J.Z. Knight, who leads the Ramtha group, hired him to write the book for her titled Finding Enlightenment: Ramtha's School of Ancient Wisdom.

Scientology has recommended Melton as a resource. And after the Cult Awareness Network was bankrupted by that group's litigation and its name was bought by a Scientologist, Gordon Melton became a "religious resource" recommended by the "new Cult Awareness Network."

Mr. Melton seems eager to help "cults" whenever he can.

He once flew to Japan to defend the cult Aum, right after it released poison gas within Tokyo's subway system. While thousands of victims were being rushed to hospitals Mr. Melton flew in, all of his expenses by the criminal cult.

For a "scholar" Gordon Melton often seems indifferent concerning historical facts.

Jim Jones was responsible for the cult mass murder-suicide of more than 900 people in 1978. However, Mr. Melton said, "This wasn't a cult. This was a respectable, mainline Christian group."

Melton has earned a reputation for largely ignoring and/or discounting the testimony of former cult members.

Professor Benjamin Beit-Hallahmi of the University of Haifa noted, "In every single case since the Jonestown tragedy, statements by ex-members turned out to be more accurate than those of apologists and NRM researchers... It is indeed baffling... the strange, deafening, silence of [such scholars]... a thorny issue... like the dog that didn't bark... should make us curious, if not outright suspicious."

Is Gordon Melton such a silent scholar, or perhaps even a "silent partner"? After all he is often paid by cults.

Melton was prominently mentioned within a confidential memo written and distributed by Jeffery Hadden. The memo has been cited as a kind of "smoking gun," regarding the cooperation of like-minded "cult apologists."

Within that memo the now deceased Hadden cited Melton's importance and willingness to cooperate in an organized effort, which would hopefully be funded by "cults," to essentially quell criticism about them.

Hadden said, "We recognize that Gordon Melton's Institute is singularly the most important information resource in the US, and we feel that any new organization would need to work closely with him."

Ostling's article carried by the AP cites Melton's "nonpartisan objectivity," but can anyone who objectively reviews his actual professional history really conclude that J. Gordon Melton is nonpartisan?