Used price: $8.00
Collectible price: $10.58
Buy one from zShops for: $8.99
Used price: $12.00
Buy one from zShops for: $27.94
After several previous UFO projects initiated by the U.S. Air Force, the Blue Book program took shape and form under a young Air Force officer by the name of Edward J. Ruppelt. In retrospect, the Blue Book project is considered by most modern-day researchers to have been nothing more than a public whitewash by the Air Force during the 1950s and '60s, yet at its inception, Ruppelt's Blue Book was a genuine investigation that attempted to get to the bottom of the saucer controversy. Captain Edward J. Ruppelt: Summer of the Saucers-1952 takes the reader directly into the middle of this fascinating milieu.
The year 1952 was a "flap year" for UFO sightings, arguably the most astounding of the last century. Authors Hall and Connors researched the fact that between March and September of 1952, American newspapers across the country reported that more than 30,000 individual sightings of UFOs had taken place. This did not reflect what was happening in the rest of the world! The magnitude of the summer of 1952 "invasion" has never again been duplicated.
Edward J. Ruppelt was known as a dedicated Air Force officer. A decorated World War II combat veteran of the Army Air Force, he returned to school after the war and earned a Bachelor of Science degree in aeronautical engineering in 1950. Married and expecting his first child, Ruppelt was recalled to active duty with the outbreak of the Korean War in 1950. In early 1951, Ruppelt was assigned to Intelligence at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base.
If you're interested in the subject of UFOs, you need to be aware of what was transpiring during this extremely important period, for this is when the groundwork was laid for military and intelligence activities connected with UFOs. For example, the first known military project to examine the flying disk reports was known to the public as "Project Saucer." The project's real name, however, was "Sign," and under Project Sign the "Estimate of the Situation" was drafted and completed. Though its existence was originally denied by the USAF, the "Estimate" is now legendary in UFO research circles. It allegedly stated that some UFOs could possibly be of interplanetary origin. After General Hoyt S. Vandenberg refused to accept this report, almost overnight the subject of UFOs became politically "incorrect," if not downright taboo. Project Sign and the "pro" proponents were "out" and the new project "Grudge" and the anti-UFO reality faction were in. The cases that were "investigated" under Grudge were laughable, but changes were coming. They came in the form of Ruppelt and the new Blue Book.
One reason that Ruppelt: Summer Of The Saucers is such a fascinating read is that authors Hall and Connor give an almost minute-by-minute account of the most famous UFO case of all, the overflights above Washington, D.C. In hindsight, these sightings were the "straw that broke the camel's back." As the days leading up to July 19, 1952 show, reports of unknown aerial objects were filling the offices of Blue Book. The project had neither the budget nor staff to handle such an influx of data, and analyses of the reports that have been located today show that many of the more important sightings did not even make it into the Blue Book files. When the sightings over the nation's capitol began, Ruppelt was out of town. In fact, he may not have been aware of the overflights until the following Monday or Tuesday. Over all, Blue Book's coverage of this event was abysmal.
Looking at the situation in the late 1940s through the 1960s from the military's perspective, a strain of schizophrenia is clearly apparent. If the reader is familiar with any of the books written by Donald Keyhoe during the 1950s, that author made this point time and again. Here, Hall and Connors imprint it in stone. In some ways, Project Blue Book seems, to this reviewer, to have been set up to fail. While highly motivated and dedicated, Ed Ruppelt was a junior officer thrust into a job with limited resources and at times questionable backing.
Today, it seems beyond belief that the American military, with the horrible memories of Pearl Harbor very fresh in their collective minds, could have denied that "something" was flying around in American skies with impunity, while seemingly under intelligent control. Yet there was a faction in the military and the CIA that apparently held no interest in the origin or purpose of these devices. They were more interested in shaping public perception (read: propagandizing the public) to ignore these objects, using lies and deceit to cover up these events on a worldwide basis. Later, the Robertson Panel, under the auspices of the CIA, would "formalize" these tactics of debunking, lying, propagandizing, and in some cases destroying the reputations of citizens who dared to buck the "company line." Not much seems to have changed in the last 50 years.
Captain Edward J. Ruppelt: Summer Of The Saucers-1952 is a fascinating book and one that I highly recommend to the informed readership. As an important piece of history, covering perhaps the most important time in UFO research, this book details what was occurring behind the scenes at Air Force and intelligence agency headquarters, and with the officers and men who had a thumb on the UFO phenomenon. Hall and Connors have done a wonderful job of research on this project and I am grateful that they have. Not since Rich Dolan's UFOs and the National Security State has any other book convinced me to continue to "watch the skies!" -Don Ecker
It happened a few days after the Halls came back from their New England vacation in the mountains. I think something happened there, where Mrs Hall had a narrow escape from a fatal accident while with the Reverend. She thought about it, and realized that if she had an accident, Reverend Ed would inherit her fortune, and be free to seek another rich wife. Eleanor would be dropped like yesterday's newspaper. Mrs Hall discussed this with her brothers, and they decided to confront the Reverend while he was with Eleanor, so he could not deny the affair, and would be forced to end it. The emotional interaction escalated beyond reason, and the deaths occurred. The best laid plans of mice and men still go astray.
The case was not solved so justice would triumph over the law. The Reverend Ed messed up his own marriage, and destroyed the Mills' marriage. Alive, he would break up another marriage. It was all for the best. When someone poor falls in love with a rich person, the poor person often comes to an unhappy ending. The rich have many resources to accomplish their ends. This is the moral of "Love Story", that love does not triumph over material facts. No matter how hard you wish it were different. Love conquers all? Forget about it!
Chapter 12 ridicules the "Pig Woman"; is this just class bias? He says "her story changed"; but is this unusual? I believe her story to be true since it dovetails with other known facts. Tomlinson says her story was made up because of the "Oh Henry" cry; yet this just happened to be her brother's name! (Or was it her version of "Oh Hell"?) You can test if a khaki coat (or pants) looks gray in the moonlight.
Many times the author questions statements made by the people involved, as reported in the newspapers. Then or now, how reliable are newspaper stories? Page 217 uses the word "katzenjammer". Think of a cat when it wants to go outside: frantic and nervous. Page 226 tells how fingerprints could be forged in the 1920s. On pages 236-7 Tomlinson commits the folly of trying to analyze someone from a long ago newspaper account; it doesn't convince me, and seems like a smear of the chief prosecution witness. Why use the comments of Salome Cerenner when there is no corroboration? His description of psychopaths' "grossly inflated sense of their self-worth and importance" sounds like many managers found in the corporate world. Jane Gibson's story was checked out by the detectives; Kunstler's book explains this. Does her story sound too good to be true? Is it very different from other eyewitness stories?
Chapter 23 shows Tomlinson doing a better job than Kunstler in analyzing Willie's testimony (p.253), and in the story of the examination of Reverend Hall's checkbook (p.271). His comments on Simpson (p.300) seems to be just a whitewash of the trial. On page 309 Tomlinson rules out the Stevens as not the type to murder to avenge family honor. Were they from South Carolina where that was more common? On page 313 Tomlinson mentions Jeffrey MacDonald; he needs to read "Fatal Justice".
Chapter 29 provides "One Man's Solution" which makes Willie the sole perpetrator. He talks about the failed marriage of the Mills, but says nothing about the Halls; why not? After earlier rejecting Jane Gibson's story, he adopts it as his solution! His comments as to a blood-stained Apperson and Willie's suit are very good! I believe his solution is wrong because he previously rejected Jan Gibson's testimony but adopted it for Chapter 29. The straw hat covering Reverend Hall's face says somebody wanted to keep the crows from pecking at and disfiguring the face; I think this says Mrs. Hall. The throat cutting and excision of the tongue and larynx suggests jealous hatred; I think this says a woman used to cutting up chickens. Some say the 1926 trial was bungled because of the 'not guilty' verdict. But it also succeeded in preventing the Stevens from ever being prosecuted!
Used price: $8.47
Collectible price: $16.85
Used price: $40.00
Collectible price: $47.50
Buy one from zShops for: $45.55
Another RDE trademark is that believable and distinct (and recognisably British) characters come to life with remarkable economy of words. As usual with RDE the plot is not over-clever, but nonetheless tight and can't be faulted. Her strength really is making everything so true-to-life. Policemen engage in real hard thinking and thorough dog-work, coping at the same time with political pressures. People act true to nature and yet don't always conform to steorotype. Milton and Amiss display real intelligence and understanding of human nature (no glaring oversight of an obvious angle which proves to be the key to the mystery). RDE mixes realism and entertainment to a commendable degree. Needless to say, she writes well; well-paced, articulate and snappy prose.
This books take the point of view of Jim Milton more than Robert Amiss, which is interesting for devotees of the series because Amiss quickly becomes central whereas Milton fades away gradually. For the reader interested in character development, this first book provides an important piece in the jigsaw. Here Milton is portrayed more vividly than in any other book in the series, and we learn to respect his patience and professionalism, and understand a little more of his personal life. Amiss is a bit flat here compared to the following and later books where he becomes more lively. One gets the feeling that perhaps at this stage RDE meant Milton to be her central character rather than Amiss. But this is the only book where he is in real and appropriate employment so for Amiss fans it is a chance to see him on his homeground.
I give this four rather then five stars because some later books in this series (Matricide, Ten Lords, Publish) are more deserving of full honours. She hasn't quite gotten into her satirical stride in this first book, though that's not to say that she's not irreverent. But it is only in later books that her satire gets truly and howlingly wicked, and her comic talent blossoms. I recommend any book in the series; not one of them is a dud.
Used price: $0.01
Collectible price: $1.25
I ordered this book for my best friend who recently lost her husband. She's not a "believer" in psychics, but I'm confident she'll enjoy this book since it's a novel and not the typical "psychic reading" book. John Edward is the best! So, buy this book for a quick, warm & fuzzy read!
In his story, the central character is Timothy Callahan, a man who hails from a large Italian American family, a typical close-knit family that loves big gatherings. But above all else, the Callahans love one another. However tragedy has struck this boisterious family when Timothy's mother discovers she has cancer.
As the family struggles to deal with this new phase of their lives, Timothy begins to wonder what happens after someone dies, when they cross over to the afterlife. In one instance as the family watches old home movies, he wonders to himself, "As I look over at my mom, I know that she's wondering if all these faces of yesteryear will be the faces of her tomorrows. Will she see them when she crosses over? Will her loved ones welcome her on the other side, as we all want to believe? I hope so."
As his mother's struggles with her battle with cancer progresses, Timothy remembers back to his childhood when his mother explained that God was the sun, an epiphany that becomes more tangible as he wrestles with impending death. As the story comes to it's emotional and dramatic end, is it the death of Timothy's mother we've been following or someone else's journey to the afterlife? Readers will be surprised.
"What If God Were The Sun?" will probably not win any big prizes for being great literature, and at some points it's hard to figure out just who the narrator is talking about, but it's overall message is relatively simple. Edward's main point is to pass along the message of letting the important people in your life know that you care for them in this lifetime. He offers a comforting message that love that can bridge even death.
In his work as a psychic medium, Edward helps survivors work through the overwhelming and sometimes unbearable grief of losing a loved one. I was personally touched by this sensitive story. Whether you believe in an afterlife or not, it's kind of nice to think that the ones we love might be watching out for us after they're gone. I'd like to think my dad and aunt are watching out for me.
Sharon Galligar Chance, Times Record News