Used price: $8.95
Collectible price: $8.99
But what will make this book immortal is Susan Howe's essay These Flames and Generosities of the Heart: Emily Dickinson and the Illogic of Sumptuary Values. To anyone who has read Emily Dickinson's poems in a "standard" or "variorum" edition of any sort, this book is a must, because you will soon learn that you have not, in fact, been reading Dickinson's words, but instead an editor's (inaccurate) version of them (whether Johnson or Franklin). Susan Howe demonstrates with a clarity and perception unmatched by any editor how the only way to understand and fully appreciate Emily Dickinson is by reading her manuscripts, some of which are reproduced in this book. And the manuscripts only make one appreciate more intensely the achievement of Emily Dickinson. If you've read Susan Howe's My Emily Dickinson, you must buy this book, as it completes the true story. It is a staggering achievement that will long be remembered as a landmark event in the understanding of America's greatest poet. American academia owes Susan Howe a debt of incalculable magnitude for this essay alone.
(Note on the other review of this book: how anyone can give this book fewer than 5 stars is a mystery. Susan Howe is a marvelous storyteller with a breadth of interests that cannot fail to intrigue even the most casual reader.)
List price: $14.95 (that's 30% off!)
Used price: $7.09
Buy one from zShops for: $7.11
List price: $24.00 (that's 30% off!)
Used price: $7.89
Collectible price: $8.00
After an interesting, informative, and vigorously written Introduction by Judith Farr, eighteen articles of varying quality follow. Of the eighteen, at least eight are definitely worth reading. From these eight, the reader comes away with an enhanced appreciation of ED's work, with a better idea of how to go about reading and understanding her poems, and in awe of her giant sensibility.
Most of the remaining essays, unfortunately, seem to a greater or lesser extent to share the same defect. They have been written from either a Christian or feminist perspective, and seem determined at all costs to find ways of making ED fit the procrustean beds of their respective ideologies. As such they end up telling us much more about their writers than about ED, and I personally found many of them unreadable.
There are so many today who seem determined to reduce ED, to cut her down to their own diminished size and rope her in for their particular cause, so many partisans who are desperately pretending: "In fact, you know, Emily Dickinson is really one of us!" ED, it is stridently affirmed, was an American, a Christian, and a female poet of the 19th century. But we all know that there were many such poets. And where are they now? Who is reading them? No-one. And if that's all ED had been I don't think anyone today would be reading her either.
ED escaped all bounds. She was, in a sense, not an 'American,' certainly not a 'Christian,' and not even a 'woman.' She was a human being immersed like all of us in the human condition, and speaking to us out of that condtion in a way no-one has ever spoken before. "Truth is so rare a thing," she once said, and her poems offer us that commodity in abundance, irrespective of our nationality, religion, or gender.
Relevant here is the indignant remark of Georgia O'Keefe which Judith Farr quotes in her fine Introduction: "I am not a _woman_ artist, I am an Artist." Farr comments: "True art, as Dickinson herself suggests . . . finally escapes categories: national, temporal, sexual" (p.15, italics in original). In other words, as a poet, ED addresses herself, not to that which divides us, but to our shared humanity.
Besides Judith Farr, I think that of the critics in the present collection at least eight others would probably agree with this. The general excellence and unbiased quality of their pieces make this collection well worth having:
Richard Wilbur, for his extremely interesting "Sumptuous Destitution," (a piece which is immediately followed by a rather weak and unconvincing feminist riposte).
Cynthia Griffin Wolff, for her Bakhtinian '[Im]pertinent Constructions of the Body and Self.'
Suzanne Juhasz, for her stimulating "The Landscape of the Spirit."
David Porter, for his 'Strangely Abstracted Images,' an extract from his The Modern Idiom (1981).
Cristanne Miller, for her 'Dickinson's Experimental Grammar: Nouns and Verbs,' an extract from her Emily
Dickinson: A Poet's Grammar (1987).
Kamilla Denman, for her superb 'Emily Dickinson's Volcanic Punctuation.'
Judy Jo Small, for her 'A Musical Aesthetic,' an extract from her Positive as Sound (1990).
Jerome McGann, for his brief but important 'Emily Dickinson's Visible Language.' I was particularly impressed by this as it seems to me to demonstrate conclusively the pressing need for an edition of ED's poems that would finally respect her lineation.
Used price: $0.99
Used price: $3.44
Buy one from zShops for: $3.98
If you're a big Dickinson fan, then definitely try to read this book. You won't find out anything that has been covered in other biographies, but I think you'll enjoy Taggart's enthusiasm. I also enjoyed the non-linear manner she employed when she jumped back in forth in the time of Dickinson's life to tell her story.
My copy of this book is a worn hardcover edition. I doubt it ever made it to paperback.
Used price: $0.57
Buy one from zShops for: $7.71
Used price: $15.84
Collectible price: $20.00
Buy one from zShops for: $15.84
There are also several factual errors, but I'm told these are being corrected for the paperback edition which is due out next month.
I adore Dickinson and was impressed with the manner in which Habegger handled his subject. He presents her with the complexity and intellectual approach toward she deserves. Emily Dickinson appears as neither the bizarre recluse nor a misunderstood sexual being of some of her previous biographies. If, as some readers have found, the poet appears a bit unresolved and incomplete, it is only because Mr. Habegger wisely chose NOT to sensationalize his book with unsubstantiated presumptions as to her personal life. I enjoyed the author's scholarly, non-sensationalist approach to Ms. Dickinson and found that it did not prevent me from "knowing her" as a person or subject.
One of Alfred Hebeggar's greatest strengths is his realization that no artist exists in a vacuum. He presents to his readers the complex outer world that inspired the poets rich inner world allowing us to draw many of our own conclusions. Meticulously researched and gently paced, the book is a journey not merely a chronicle of a single life. Instead, it is an insightful look at the entire Dickinsonian world of family, academics, and petty town politics. Habegger introduces the reader to the poet's entire extended family and the emotional movement within it. He allows the reader to truly see the social and political environment in which the poet lived. And that is fascinating in its own right.
Overall, I enjoyed the book very much and appreciate Alfred Hebeggar's unique ability to strike a balance scholarship and authorship. He is never condescending, yet he explains thoroughly. He treats the reader as an intelligent person with a mind eager for historical details and biographical accuracy and he treats his subject with respect and intellectual dignity. His book is academically valid without sacrificing the art of solid writing.
There is no doubt that Dickinson ranks as one of the greatest American poets, due to her concise, spare, whimsical, and cerebral approach. Personally, I have never warmed to her poetry as I sense something lacking. She elevates feeling above all, as do all the poets of the romantic period. Unlike her Puritan ancestors, for whom the greatest love was the love of God, her energies and attachments all flow both from, and toward, her own feelings. Like a moonstruck adolescent, she prefers her dreams of love to the actual presence of the loved one. From her decision to withdraw from the necessary order and balance of the outside world, comes this outpouring of intense feeling expressed in the large body of her work.
As a Lay Carmelite whose spiritual life has also been informed by Puritan ancestors, I praise the beauty of Dickinson's poems, but I cannot deny what seems to me their essential, self-referring shallowness. I know many will disagree with me and I do not disallow her position in the American canon.
Howe's passion for her subject is obvious, especially in the interview at the end. But the essays sometimes felt to me at least more like a display of cleverness than an effort to understand the figures she writes about. Like Charles Olson's "Call Me Ishmael," Howe's model, "The Birth-mark" squats a little uneasily between scholarship and poetry. The poet's own voice and sense of style tend to muffle the more distant Puritan voices, male and female, she's out to recover. Maybe this is the danger of not editing one's voice as a historian. Still, I'm glad I read this book--yet another reminder of what doesn't get into history and why.