Book reviews for "Cummings,_Priscilla" sorted by average review score:
Anne Geddes 2003 Wall Calendar
Published in Paperback by Andrews McMeel Pub (Cal) (1902)
Amazon base price: $12.99
Used price: $9.99
Collectible price: $9.98
Used price: $9.99
Collectible price: $9.98
Average review score:
Beautiful piece of artwork
The Blue Fairy Book
Published in Paperback by Dover Pubns (1975)
Amazon base price: $8.95
Used price: $25.00
Buy one from zShops for: $20.00
Used price: $25.00
Buy one from zShops for: $20.00
Average review score:
No reviews found.
Oswald and the Timberdoodles
Published in Hardcover by Tidewater Pub (1990)
Amazon base price: $8.95
Used price: $6.95
Used price: $6.95
Average review score:
No reviews found.
Das Kino im Kopf : eine Anthologie
Published in Unknown Binding by Arche ()
Amazon base price: $
Used price: $4.00
Buy one from zShops for: $11.20
Used price: $4.00
Buy one from zShops for: $11.20
Average review score:
No reviews found.
Six Who Went Far
Published in VHS Tape by Anchor Bay Entertain (11 July, 1991)
Amazon base price: $7.99
Buy one from zShops for: $26.90
Buy one from zShops for: $26.90
Average review score:
No reviews found.
Understanding Physics, Part One
Published in Paperback by John Wiley & Sons (2003)
Amazon base price: $42.60
Average review score:
No reviews found.
Related Subjects: Author Index Reviews Page 1 2
Search Authors.BooksUnderReview.com
Reviews are from readers at Amazon.com. To add a review, follow the Amazon buy link above.
I've seen reviews on the book that the pictures came from saying that it is baby porn and complaining about the thin stature of the moms, and the fact that the infants seem to be in uncomfortable/precarioius positions. First of all, if it was pornographic or the infants portrayed were in any real discomfort/danger, I don't think this would have been on the market for very long (and we would have heard about legal proceedings). It is definitely not pornagraphic. The nude pictures are most definitely artwork and no nipples, or other "private" parts are shown. Most of the babies are 2-4 weeks old, so it is not inconceivable that these moms lost their weight naturally (especially considering she has pregnant pictures of some of the same moms). As for the positions of the infants, many actually enjoy being in seemingly scrunched up positions due to the similarity to the position they were in in the womb. Also, one must realize that a skilled photographer is capable of manipulating her photos, so it is likely the children were not in as precarious a position as some of the pictures might convey (such as the ones where the baby is seemingly coming out of a dangling leaf).