San Francisco politics. Bridge politics. Egos clashing and crashing. The original "Survivor" saga, this book has all sorts of people intrique. Strauss is definitely the book's Richard. If the two of them ever sought out the same goal....yikes!! Strauss cut deals with everyone from whom he could benefit, and he axed out those "friends" as soon as he was finished 'using' them. The designer, Ellis...out, and it was three years before he could find another job in the depression 30s. O'Shaunassy, as SF's city engineer, was right in there swinging from the start. Michael was voted out by Strauss, and cast aside. (He did finish the Hetch Hetchy project for the city.) Strauss created a string of bodies as his ego forged ahead to be known as "Mr. Bridge, designer, builder, ......" of the Golden Gate span. Well, he was none of these things. Unfortunately, the text is quite weak on providing the engineering details of the span.The few pictures the book has are interesting, but not sufficient to acquire a good idea of the supurb engineering that went into the structure. You'll have to go to another book for that!

The book is one of the few books that I've ever read twice. And I find that I've continued to tell other people about this book from time to time. I would characterize the book as a thriller or, at least a drama, for and about engineers. The book is highly location-conscious. After reading the book, you'll be able to relate how the Golden Gate Bridge is related to engineering companies in New York City, to fund-raising efforts in the northern counties in California, to engineering professors in the mid-west, to a theater designer of the 1939 World's Fair on Treasure Island, to professors at U.C.Berkeley, and to a certain humble bascule bridge that continues its unsung day-to-day chores in an obscure part of San Francisco. To repeat, I really liked the author's interconnections, that he related in the book. The book deserves to be back in print, and it deserves to be in every gift shop in the City. The book is highly fact-based (it is not laced with fanciful commentary), and yet the book is difficult to put down. Perhaps the most striking and sad part of Van Der Zee's book, is that the engineer responsible for most of the innovations of the bridge was left off of the plaque (for political reasons), which is mounted on the Golden Gate Bridge.

Don't be fooled by the way-off-the-mark comments from an earlier reviewer about how "riveting" and "carefully researched" this book is. That's hogwash. Simply put, this book is lousy. Instead of research we get preaching. Instead of details, we get complaints. Worst of all, the author seems to think the book is really about *his* hangups with the Catholic Church, rather than the real story (Ziemann's scandal) he purports to write about.

What a drag that an important opportunity to tell this story was so badly botched.

The Bishop Zeimann scandal in Santa Rosa was shocking, even by today's standards, and it should have been written about by a thorough, competent journalist -- exactly what the author of "Agony in the Garden" is not. This book is thin on research and bloated with pomposity. It's basically a slow-moving vehichle for the author to prattle on about his pet peeves regarding Catholic sexual ethics (birth control), feminist demands (ordination of women), and Catholic customs (celibate clergy). If only he had spent as much time actually researching the story (as opposed to simply stringing together already known details of the scandal that are readily available in the press) as he did whining about things he dislikes in the Catholic Church. One can only hope that someday a serious writer, not a whiner, will tackle this sickening story and give it the competent treatment it should have received, but didn't, in this book.

This book is hardly the carefully researched analysis of the scandal in the Santa Rosa diocese that I had hoped for. Rather, it's a mish-mash of the author's ranting against the Catholic Church's teachings and pontificating about the evils of priestly celibacy and the obvious hyper-importance he attaches to feminist complaints against Catholicism. Was the author trying to win some kind of feminist think-tank award by parading his outrage over the fact that the Catholic Church doesn't ordain women? If so, he should win something for his efforts. But that's about the only sort of prize this book deserves. It's ruined by the sycophantic whining about the "plight" of Catholic women, celibacy, and his other pet peeves. And that's a darn shame. This sordid story about what happened in Santa Rosa and how Bishop Zeimann had to resign in disgrace over the revelation of his financial mismanagement and homosexual affair with a priest of the diocese desrves an objective analysis by an objective author. Agony in the Garden has neither. Don't waste your time and money. I wish I hadn't wasted mine.

John van der Zee's treatment of the recent scandels in the Diocese of Santa Rosa manages to be both illuminating and riveting. I took the book on a business trip and was drawn in by the "Forward". Having begun, I could not stop until finished.

The author delivers a blow-by-blow account of the events, revelations and shameful cover-up. He provides the reader with the personal history of the main players for perspective. He also intermixes his thoughts on the systemic problems with the Catholic Church which contibuted to or, perhaps, allowed the entire debacle to occur. I appreciate the fact that this was done lightly in a manner which was designed to provoke thought rather than conclusions.

As a short-lived member of a Diocesan finance subcomittee, I found his material to be well-researched and his conclusions reasoned. His observations about the future of the Catholic Church in the modern world are particularly compelling.

While this book could easily be turned into a riveting Hollywood movie, it is much more valuable as a reminder that absolute power vested in a few individuals should be avoided by any organization and that we must all demand honesty and accountability from our leaders whether they be financial, political or spiritual.