Used price: $5.51
Collectible price: $12.96
Buy one from zShops for: $9.00
The factory system resulted in a permanent class of wage laborers who could never own their own shop, and this frustration was followed by more drinking (p.10). Increased alcohol use was followed by tavern and street riots (p.12). Science found that alcohol was not good, whether in whiskey or beer. This refuted the long-held beliefs from olden times, and was used to support attempts to restrict or ban alcohol.
The economic problems of the 1870s and later marked the formation of the WCTU and the Prohibition Party. But some believed that poverty and hopelessness bred alcohol dependency, not the reverse (p.71). (Could this explain obesity today?) Most saloons were tied to breweries to provide outlets for what was now a big business (p.94). (Like gasoline stations today?) Many offered a free lunch with a nickel beer, often better or cheaper than in restaurants (p.104).
Prohibition in America came about from the Anti-Saloon League founded in 1895. It was the first modern professional lobby composed of salaried employees supported by donations from the public, and millionaires (pp.113-4). Chapter 6 explains how this was done. Chapter 7 describes the background lobbying used to bring about prohibition as needed for the war effort. Prohibition would result in order, efficiency, and alertness (p.149); it would win the war and create prosperity too. Here's how the trick was done: the 18th Amendment banned the sale and manufacture of "intoxicating beverages"; many thought this only applied to whiskey and brandy. Afterwards the Volstead Act was passed to set the standard at 0.5% alcohol, which now applied to beer and wine as well! Instead of peace and prosperity, the 1920s had crime, violence, and then the Depression. Chapter 8 tells of the problems of prohibition, and how it was repealed almost as quickly as it was enacted. Some say it was a "noble experiment", as if ordinary Americans were laboratory rats to be tested by social engineers. This book is important as a short history. Are the same lobbying tricks being repeated today?
Used price: $7.20
The Anti-Saloon League, created in 1895, spearheaded Prohibition. Rather than attack the drinker, they attacked the saloons where beer was sold. [Gun Prohibitionists attack gun stores and gun shows rather than gun owners.] The ASL asked their members to support the candidate, not the party. [Gun Prohibitionists operate in the shadows, and can influence officials better that way.] There were few women members in the ASL. [Gun Prohibitionists often feature women in leadership roles, even if the money men keep out of sight.] Control of the ASL remained in the hands of professional staffs. [Gun Prohibitionists use professional liars from advertising, public relations, and such.] The ASL ran on money donated by millionaires, and other donors. [Gun Prohibitionists are funded by front groups for millionaires, such as the Joyce Foundation or Open Society Institute. One millionaire created the Million Mom March, Inc; his withdrawal of funds ended it.]
Chapter 7 provides a seminar on influencing laws. Supporters were asked to write personal letters rather than sign petitions (p.1210. The ASL promised low taxes, peaceful politics, and a booming economy. [Gun Prohibitionists also make promises.] The ASL made use of democratic innovations such as initiative and referendum, and primary elections to advance their goals, yet tried to block their use against prohibitionists! The ASL wanted home rule where they could win, but banned it where they would lose (p.123)!
There are two things unmentioned (or unmentionable) in this book. First, the creation of public water supplies provided a safe alternative to beer (the historic remedy against polluted water). Second, the prohibition of alcohol provided a steady support to newly created organized crime (which still depends on local funding). Industrial capitalism needed criminal gangs to do its work in subjugating and exploiting wage earners. Were they needed to to the job that lawyers couldn't do?