This is the first of the "Princess Navina" series I've read, and I'm just blown away by how well done it is. It is beautifully written in the great tradition of childrens' books also being good literature. It quickly and convincingly teaches its lessons without being pedantic, boring, or dogmatic. It is optimistic and fun-loving in tone, making it an easy and welcome read for children and adults alike. Finally, if read by children, its message of the importantce of generosity, cooperation, and nonviolence could positively shape entire lifes. I believe children and adults of all ages will benefit greatly from reading this book. I'll definitely be giving this book away to nieces, nephews, and even brothers and sisters at Christmas.

James Payne writes a strong analysis of the difference between "sympathetic giving" and "expectant giving."

He clearly explains why government cannot maintain the kind of tough love that leads people out of poverty and shows that sympathy is ..., and exchange -- expecting something in return for assistance given, from those capable of working - is crucial. The subtitle - Expecting More from the Poor and from Ourselves - suggests the need for more volunteering by the non-needy.

As an attorney who has done pro bono and charity work to help poor people, but who also has prosecuted welfare fraud and food stamp fraud cases, and as an attorney (and future trustee) for a very large charitable foundation that seeks to help the poor, I found James L. Payne's, "Overcoming Welfare," an excellent look at the sorry reality of entitlement programs, which are based predominantly on what Payne calls "sympathetic giving." Payne does a reasonably thorough job, using a very accessible writing style, not only in explaining why sympathetic giving programs fail and are destined to fail (human nature and the "aggravation principle," plus inherent problems with bureaucracy), but in advocating a better alternative -- expectant giving. I have seen both types of giving at work, and I am convinced that expectant giving, although not perfect (no poverty program is), is far and away superior to sympathetic giving. This book is an excellent introduction to the field. I wish everyone in the poverty relief field would read it.

As an attorney, I have done some pro bono work in the past and have also helped out in soup kitchens and Salvation Army food vans. I work for a private charitable foundation the mission of which is to help the poor; someday, I will be one of the trustees making grant decisions. I have attended poverty-related seminars at the annual Council on Foundations meeting; the single point of view represented there is that of a need for ever-increasing entitlement benefits. Thus, policy issues relating to poverty are of major practical concern to me. For this reason, James L. Payne's book was a breath of fresh air.

For a variety of reasons, I think that Payne hits the nail right on the head in his analysis of the reasons for the failure of poverty programs that practice what he calls "sympathetic giving." Although some receipients find their way out of poverty, it is despite these programs, not because of them. Sympathetic giving provides extremely perverse incentives (the "aggravation principle") not to work one's way out of poverty. It is basic human nature at work. Our government has wasted trillions of dollars on misguided anti-poverty policies. The bureaucratic structure of government programs helps to guarantee the poor result, especially with something-for-nothing give-aways. The fraud is substantial. I've seen it at work for 20 years; oh, the true stories I could relate!

I was sincerely touched by Payne's telling of the success stories that resulted from what he calls "expectant giving." I now am convinced that expectant giving is the better way to help people in need. The challenge is to bring to an end all government poverty programs (whether rapidly or gradually), and to leave it to private charity to deal with the poverty problem. No doubt, there always will be poor people, but expectant giving, properly carried out, will be more effective in result than sympathetic giving programs.

I am so impressed with Payne's book that I want to purchase many copies of it and give them to friends and acquaintances in the poverty field, in the hope that we can begin to think and act differently in our approach to poor people, so that we can truly help, rather than hinder, their lives in the long run. I would really like to speak to Mr. Payne about how to make this happen.

It was not the best book I have read, but it was close to the worst. My mom made me read it, and do this review. It taught me alot how rulers rule thier countries. And how mean they are to thier people. But it was boring. You can tell it isn't a poplular book, there are only 2 reviews. (hint hint)

Presented in a friendly children's book format, Navina travels the world to learn from other countries' political mistakes. Malvolia thrives on its subjects feeling bad, encouraging them to find and wallow in miserable circumstances, offering subsidies for those who succeed. Then you wonder which came first: misery or subsidy.... Could be an educational tool for a high school government class.