I am a skeptical professional scientist looking for alternate views on how science should be conducted. This book is a joke, and a short one with big margins, that isn't funny. It may be valuable if you are considering writing a book and want to feel encouraged by how bad you can be and still get published. The authors get close to some significant worries about the misuse of science, but come nowhere near capturing our interest, preoccupied as they are with getting the 59 pages written. It took me an hour to read; it can't have taken them more than a weekend to write. We'd love to silence bad science, but would settle for silencing charlatans like these two.

Promoting a liberal agenda is not what science should do. It should promote the truth and freedom, and free enterprise, and not bias. Too bad those slimy evil liberals hijack science for their own sick agenda, like one world government or anti capitalist. This book shows how they are ALL WRONG!

I'll be honest--this book does speak to my libertarian notions, but in truth, the science in it holds up better than the "science" of the kind it attacks (generally, the "science" cited by environmentalists).

The suggestion that a negative reviewer makes below for "Science Under Seige" as being "unbiased" is ridiculous. That work is in the camp of the Gore/Ehrlich alarmist liars. If this book is biased, then that one is 100x moreso.

Furthermore, I'd say that this book definitely holds up better on logical merits than most books which sell the opposite viewpoints.