A fair-minded look at the problems of various proofs of God from an atheistic perspective. Some of the arguments Gale presents, I think, are unnecessarily confusing and technical. Moreover, I think Gale misses capitalizing on some points he incidentally makes and over-emphasizes the problematicism of certain issues, but only infrequently so. In any case, the book is very considerate and Gale consistently displays a good sense of humour throughout it. Readers without fairly-advanced knowledge of formal logic and recent debate on metaphysics may find this book forbidding. In any case, it makes a good addition to one's library.

I came across this one at a local book store in my neighborhood, and it was a very good find. I had never heard of this book, nor do I recall any other Atheist sites that list it, yet I rate it with Martin's Atheism: A Philosophical Justification as one of the better books on the subject. The author does not cover the basics anywhere near as thorough as Smith does, but the book is a nice introduction to Atheological arguments. Attempts are made to discredit the existence of God, and the very concept of some of His attributes (such as omnipotence, omniscience, et cetera). Most entertaining of all, Gale touches on the question of things God can and cannot create (such as four-sided triangles, et cetera). While these are questions that many theists have tried to wave off as absurd or even sophomoric, Gale does a great job of giving them a more sound quality

Some reviewer have had some problems with the more technical aspects of this book, but they are there precisely because Prof. Gale is dealing with the most subtle and sophisticated problems in the most subtle and sophisticated way. It is helpful, but not at all necessary, to have some familiarity with modal logic. Readers without the technical background will still be able to follow most of Prof. Gale's arguments.
The virtues of this book are numerous. When it comes to the issues of whether "God" is a self-consistent concept, whether the universe requires an explanation, whether the argument from evil is defeated by appeal to free will, and whether religious experience provides a rational basis for religious belief, there are simply no comparable treatments available. Gale's treatments are far and away the most comprehensive and sophisticated available. Gale also has an unfailing sense of humor and has no particular axe to grind.