Starting from the little that is known of Masada from the writings of Josephus and the archeological excavations which have taken place at the site, Nachman ben-Yehuda traces the development of the "history" of Masada over the course of the twentieth century and the use to which this history has been put in the building of Israeli national identity. Recognizing that little may be certain as to who was actually at Masada (patriots or thugs) and what actually happened there (suicides or murders), he traces the development of the Masada story into a "never again" national saga. Very interesting reading for anyone interested in the development of historical truth, and how loosely it might relate to what really happened. The book is well written, although somewhat repetitive in places, and (for example, in showing how various youth groups in Palestine and later Israel dealt with Masada) sometimes tells us more than we need to know about the subject. Recommended reading

...but also concerning, - Ahessel writes "to what really happened". The problem is nothing confirmable "really" happened. You see the only record of "what happened" are the questionable writings by Josephus. The contemporary Masada legend of a heroic last stand by patriots does n o t correspond to the writings of Josephus. The logic went (somewhat): "if we assume Josephus is inaccurate because of his own interests, our interpretation can be just as good -- ok: an interpretation combining a physical attachement to the land (sojourns to Masada) and needed national visions -- just because it corresponds with such a need, this doesn't make it untrue."

But it also doesn't make it true -- legend.

The book is a factual account of how this happened and a functional anlysis (functionalism -- a sociological paradigm).

Nachmans account of his interviews with the originators of the Masada legend are exceptional.

"Moral panics" as a defined concept has been around since 1972 when the British sociologist Steven Cohen was attempting to explain the peculiar hysteria surrounding a small, but violent incident between British youths at a seaside resort. The incident took place in 1964 between two youth groups who became known as the Mods and the Rockers.

What fascinated Cohen was how an incident seemingly so trivial as that between the Mods and Rockers, could have been taken by the news media, parents groups, and politicians to such hyperbolic heights. Due to Cohen's amazement and his search for a thesis topic, the beginning of a theory explaining the rise and fall of hysteria on a mass scale began. "Moral Panics" is an excellent introductory text to the concept of moral panic theory, besides Cohen's own study - "Folk Devils and Moral Panics: The Creation of the Mods and Rockers" (1972).

The correlation of moral panic theory and the wide-scale phenomenon during the 1980s of a growing irrational perception that all drug users were dangerous miscreants, that if drug users are not eradicated the state of America would quickly deteriorate, &c. may not be explicitly evident at first. However, when a false dichotomy between what is really the case and what is thought to be case is exposed and the difference which caused an over-reaction is recognized, then the notion of a moral panic becomes more tenable as an explanation. Not necessarily in the pejorative sense, but naturally, groups of people can be easily led to believe something that is simply not true. Oftentimes, this is because the only perceived source(s) of information are the official mainstream news programs which have from time to time (maybe many, many times) shared in disinformation and/or sensationalism.

This book is dedicated to defining moral panics, how they occur, how they are sustained, and, finally, how they decline in the context of what sociologists call Cultural Constructionism. As was mentioned in Erich Goode's book "Strange Bedfellows: Ideology, Politics, and the Drug Legalization Debate in Between Politics and Reason," constructionism is a member of the group of competing notions that either support, study, or oppose drug policy, both nationally and internationally. I would suggest that this entire text be read in order to not only understand drug policy studies in the context of radical (cultural Constructionism) but to understand how moral panics can be created to support any regime's agenda.

Chapter 12, for instance, discusses the "crack baby" myth that was taken by the media, politicians, and parents to a height of misinformation and paranoia similar, perhaps, to "reefer madness" back in the 1930s; the crack baby hysteria is discussed in detail, it demonstrates just how easy it is to cause a "panic" about something when relevant information is not either not available or withheld and only rumour, hyperbole, and political rhetoric are the sources of information.

It is a good idea to know about moral panics in general, even though I'm writing this review from the perspective of a person interested in the dynamics of US drug policy. Knowing that what a politician or talking head is saying could very well be nothing but disinformation can at least encourage a healthy skepticism in all matters of public affair.

I encourage you to read this, however it may be beneficial to read Cohen's study first.